Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-62111-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 17:34:16 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add Sipeed Longan Module
 3H and Longan Pi 3H
Message-ID: <20240212-stowaway-cartel-3aee8992cbd3@spud>
References: <20240211081739.395-1-jszhang@kernel.org>
 <20240211081739.395-2-jszhang@kernel.org>
 <7ee6df91-76fa-44e8-ab81-fd4b63b58ce9@linaro.org>
 <Zcn0POS-4BFGlRm9@xhacker>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Zcn0POS-4BFGlRm9@xhacker>


--0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 05:29:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 11/02/2024 09:17, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Add name & compatible for the Sipeed Longan Module 3H and Longan PI 3H
> > > board.
> > >=20
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > > ---
> >=20
> > This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>=20
> Oops, I forgot to add Conor's ack...
> >=20
> > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> >=20
> > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> > versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
> > provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
> > can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
> > the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
> > version they apply.
>=20
> IIRC, the b4 can only help on the latest version. If I missed the ack
> in v3, the ack tag will be lost. So how to handle this case? repost or
> Conor gave an ack to v3 again?

I think what the form letter means is that b4 could've been used to
update the tags before you sent out this version.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Thanks,
Conor.

--0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZcpWlwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0vfmAP9vnhNT21FPEZvJBVqAq/zGnEYv66OKEvr9wmbMN0SKhgEAz5hJd9Pze5gc
WNJ0kmlU85hnwoHnzp0By4eM5hPO6Qw=
=Vnxj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0uyXRW8V1u8HTXNs--