Received: by 2002:a05:7412:2a91:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id u17csp126970rdh; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:21:32 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVpG2EOUIwFczBsyehmyw+3U4+aSAvLpCHxSrc23pWf4lPIm3Pq8IOS3WHy7lk1FQFiIJZ+//+Q2FdYN7RnQVrTbShFSyF5bN65Kh3wuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDFJV6W+K7n/EzGgoTAFqgTQSaSynVlktaH4YHcGRomDRo/scaPImedaC2XJZun4URGy/q X-Received: by 2002:ac2:55a8:0:b0:511:a02b:8223 with SMTP id y8-20020ac255a8000000b00511a02b8223mr262963lfg.58.1707852092542; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:21:32 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUQi+Fjw1PFquENbzPIYrw8C1EZYDz5KhZGbeMLOb7aedIlvMpcHBQNJNkFN8aMdpXRADmOv304QjaXfBqb4x/FEumWbTsXcj/fsb4ZfA== Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id xo13-20020a170907bb8d00b00a3d04fe74bdsi847543ejc.372.2024.02.13.11.21.32 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:21:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-64154-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=sbd0fqH+; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-64154-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-64154-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8CF31F2308D for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D07660875; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="sbd0fqH+" Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E1A15812E; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707852054; cv=none; b=W/fa5R1yVK7pungNQgaFhX6pvvuVv/qF7iAQ31ifm1QWW0Dwlr2l+MYNw+DowaboZJqJP57R/vVZ9c/Ucv30O/AAsoMvejlcPnVRJ8lBoZ0zWfjmrb3pc1HGvM4iK3/VzjIEXokc15+yqfTGOh917qKBGPU62hkBI4tQpcIlHwc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707852054; c=relaxed/simple; bh=62+TMzhu0tgv3ZB2azIQJRCmQ4u6vlGyJMQahNrc4uk=; h=Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Message-Id:Subject; b=ofCL8ariIGf07bjbu+6hORcn6HuaQKileR8574bdXxQS6zVIsgT3IlGL3RiUCKlFwlvbyfjJsLNdmF1GsOtmJONphhdV+iYNV4iBx0d9ra36puOKMu/arY3Xr5ofdUWvvkIT12wfW1H7cYjRv4Qbkj8WSPw2b62CrYYmTq+EO9E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=sbd0fqH+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA009C43390; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:20:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707852054; bh=62+TMzhu0tgv3ZB2azIQJRCmQ4u6vlGyJMQahNrc4uk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=sbd0fqH+8fvVZaS1HuE3/gKHgknB/hO//wWuduGJaEFz/hazFvc04ACkBmNqNtx8n H7mDZmu6KSOn/t5P4Msus8XXa3SnUz6qf55F1iS7YTgf1Zyrm3TPA+gr8bQjxrF7Pa E42YrmQ6GXCnMHkxl3xqCXtD9+mq+dOKgZvN8HsLGiBTtTDcUTyOZF/JBOnXi2i7Np hfKv02rU9a4xvwksbgoxZUExV3ZCoLIi9dg09ID5eb2L9nZMsOdPWCKx1LRTldneai OA0oYU1Hz6GbJiT7vCCbaG9dNXpQ92iO82K4wIHVTHRzL3Vm0oePYTO3CwsG0dcKlp 6YbKhq522Lj6w== Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:20:52 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Rob Herring To: Tanmay Shah Cc: andersson@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@amd.com, Radhey Shyam Pandey , ben.levinsky@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: <20240213175450.3097308-3-tanmay.shah@amd.com> References: <20240213175450.3097308-1-tanmay.shah@amd.com> <20240213175450.3097308-3-tanmay.shah@amd.com> Message-Id: <170785205177.2155555.1311787541370066483.robh@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:54:48 -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote: > From: Radhey Shyam Pandey > > Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq > UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree > and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven. > > Tightly-coupled memories(TCMs) are low-latency memory that provides > predictable instruction execution and predictable data load/store > timing. Each Cortex-R5F processor contains two 64-bit wide 64 KB memory > banks on the ATCM and BTCM ports, for a total of 128 KB of memory. > > The TCM resources(reg, reg-names and power-domain) are documented for > each TCM in the R5 node. The reg and reg-names are made as required > properties as we don't want to hardcode TCM addresses for future > platforms and for zu+ legacy implementation will ensure that the > old dts w/o reg/reg-names works and stable ABI is maintained. > > It also extends the examples for TCM split and lockstep modes. > > Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey > Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah > --- > > Changes in v10: > - modify number of "reg", "reg-names" and "power-domains" entries > based on cluster mode > - Add extra optional atcm and btcm in "reg" property for lockstep mode > - Add "reg-names" for extra optional atcm and btcm for lockstep mode > - Drop previous Ack as bindings has new change > > Changes in v9: > - None > Changes in v8: > - None > Changes in v7: > - None > Changes in v6: > - None > Changes in v5: > - None > > Changes in v4: > - Use address-cells and size-cells value 2 > - Modify ranges property as per new value of address-cells > and size-cells > - Modify child node "reg" property accordingly > - Remove previous ack for further review > > v4 link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230829181900.2561194-2-tanmay.shah@amd.com/ > > .../remoteproc/xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss.yaml | 192 ++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: /Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss.yaml:118:13: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12 (indentation) dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240213175450.3097308-3-tanmay.shah@amd.com The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.