Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-64474-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 22:40:00 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20240213223810.2595804-1-ericchancf@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20240213223810.2595804-1-ericchancf@google.com>
Message-ID: <20240213224000.2597959-1-ericchancf@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] riscv/barrier: Resolve checkpatch.pl error
From: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com>
To: paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	ericchancf@google.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

The past form of RISCV_FENCE would cause checkpatch.pl to issue
error messages, the example is as follows:
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
+#define __atomic_acquire_fence()       RISCV_FENCE(r,rw)
                                                     ^
fix the remaining of RISCV_FENCE.

Signed-off-by: Eric Chan <ericchancf@google.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
index 4f4743d7440d..880b56d8480d 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -19,19 +19,19 @@
 
 
 /* These barriers need to enforce ordering on both devices or memory. */
-#define __mb()		RISCV_FENCE(iorw,iorw)
-#define __rmb()		RISCV_FENCE(ir,ir)
-#define __wmb()		RISCV_FENCE(ow,ow)
+#define __mb()		RISCV_FENCE(iorw, iorw)
+#define __rmb()		RISCV_FENCE(ir, ir)
+#define __wmb()		RISCV_FENCE(ow, ow)
 
 /* These barriers do not need to enforce ordering on devices, just memory. */
-#define __smp_mb()	RISCV_FENCE(rw,rw)
-#define __smp_rmb()	RISCV_FENCE(r,r)
-#define __smp_wmb()	RISCV_FENCE(w,w)
+#define __smp_mb()	RISCV_FENCE(rw, rw)
+#define __smp_rmb()	RISCV_FENCE(r, r)
+#define __smp_wmb()	RISCV_FENCE(w, w)
 
 #define __smp_store_release(p, v)					\
 do {									\
 	compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);				\
-	RISCV_FENCE(rw,w);						\
+	RISCV_FENCE(rw, w);						\
 	WRITE_ONCE(*p, v);						\
 } while (0)
 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ do {									\
 ({									\
 	typeof(*p) ___p1 = READ_ONCE(*p);				\
 	compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);				\
-	RISCV_FENCE(r,rw);						\
+	RISCV_FENCE(r, rw);						\
 	___p1;								\
 })
 
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ do {									\
  * instances the scheduler pairs this with an mb(), so nothing is necessary on
  * the new hart.
  */
-#define smp_mb__after_spinlock()	RISCV_FENCE(iorw,iorw)
+#define smp_mb__after_spinlock()	RISCV_FENCE(iorw, iorw)
 
 #include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
 
-- 
2.43.0.687.g38aa6559b0-goog