Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-64716-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240205-fix-device-links-overlays-v2-0-5344f8c79d57@analog.com>
 <20240205-fix-device-links-overlays-v2-2-5344f8c79d57@analog.com>
 <aed988a09cb4347ec7ac1b682c4ee53b7d2a840b.camel@gmail.com>
 <20240213145131.GA1180152-robh@kernel.org> <48a86fa6908a2a7a38a45dc6dbb5574c4a9d7400.camel@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48a86fa6908a2a7a38a45dc6dbb5574c4a9d7400.camel@gmail.com>
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:44:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGETcx9xgLykm7Ti-A4+sYxQkn=KTUptW9fbFxgTcceihutwRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of: dynamic: flush devlinks workqueue before
 destroying the changeset
To: =?UTF-8?B?TnVubyBTw6E=?= <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, 
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, 
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 6:57=E2=80=AFAM Nuno S=C3=A1 <noname.nuno@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-02-13 at 08:51 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:10:27PM +0100, Nuno S=C3=A1 wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 13:09 +0100, Nuno Sa wrote:
> > > > Device links will drop their supplier + consumer refcounts
> > > > asynchronously. That means that the refcount of the of_node attache=
d to
> > > > these devices will also be dropped asynchronously and so we cannot
> > > > guarantee the DT overlay assumption that the of_node refcount must =
be 1 in
> > > > __of_changeset_entry_destroy().
> > > >
> > > > Given the above, call the new fwnode_links_flush_queue() helper to =
flush
> > > > the devlink workqueue so we can be sure that all links are dropped =
before
> > > > doing the proper checks.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/of/dynamic.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > > > index 3bf27052832f..b7153c72c9c9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c
> > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/string.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/fwnode.h>
> > > >
> > > >  #include "of_private.h"
> > > >
> > > > @@ -518,6 +519,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_changeset_create_node);
> > > >
> > > >  static void __of_changeset_entry_destroy(struct of_changeset_entry=
 *ce)
> > > >  {
> > > > + /*
> > > > +  * device links drop their device references (and hence their
> > > > of_node
> > > > +  * references) asynchronously on a dedicated workqueue. Hence we
> > > > need
> > > > +  * to flush it to make sure everything is done before doing the
> > > > below
> > > > +  * checks.
> > > > +  */
> > > > + fwnode_links_flush_queue();
> > > >   if (ce->action =3D=3D OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE &&
> > > >       of_node_check_flag(ce->np, OF_OVERLAY)) {
> > > >           if (kref_read(&ce->np->kobj.kref) > 1) {
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Rob and Frank,
> > >
> > > Any way you could take a look at this and see if you're ok with the c=
hange
> > > in the
> > > overlay code?
> > >
> > > On the devlink side , we already got the ok from Rafael.
> >
> > Didn't Saravana say he was going to look at this? As of yesterday, he's
> > also a DT maintainer so deferring to him.
> >
>
> Yeah, I did asked him but I guess he never had the time for it... Saravan=
a,
> could you please give some feedback on this? I think the most sensible pa=
rt is
> on the devlink side but I assume this is not going to be merged without a=
n ack
> from a DT maintainer...

Sorry for the delay Nuno. I'll get to this. I promise. This week is a bit b=
usy.

-Saravana