Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65049-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:28:37 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kw@linux.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	quic_krichai@quicinc.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Add D3 support for PCI bridges in DT based
 platforms
Message-ID: <20240214102837.GA30420@wunner.de>
References: <20240214-pcie-qcom-bridge-v2-1-9dd6dbb1b817@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240214-pcie-qcom-bridge-v2-1-9dd6dbb1b817@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 02:18:31PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> +/**
> + * of_pci_bridge_d3 - Check if the bridge is supporting D3 states or not
> + *
> + * @node: device tree node of the bridge
> + *
> + * Return: True if the bridge is supporting D3 states, False otherwise.

A lot of kernel-doc uses %true and %false.


> +bool of_pci_bridge_d3(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	return of_property_read_bool(node, "supports-d3");
> +}

What's the difference between of_property_read_bool() and
of_property_present()?  When should one use which?
The former has 691 occurrences in the tree, the latter 120.
The latter would seem more "literary" / readable here,
but maybe that's just me.


> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -1142,6 +1142,9 @@ static inline bool platform_pci_bridge_d3(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (pci_use_mid_pm())
>  		return false;
>  
> +	if (dev->dev.of_node)
> +		return of_pci_bridge_d3(dev->dev.of_node);
> +
>  	return acpi_pci_bridge_d3(dev);
>  }

This will result in an unnecessary test on non-DT platforms (e.g. ACPI)
whether dev->dev.of_node is set.

Please use dev_of_node() instead of "dev->dev.of_node" so that the
code added here can be optimized away by the compiler on non-DT
platforms (due to the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)).

Thanks,

Lukas