Received: by 2002:a05:7412:2a91:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id u17csp538410rdh; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 04:43:16 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCVkMJHt1zgY2URMCv5BoSW7I2x9WWI5v5ew3aCtV15ruZLp6dlGYazmeqIS/Yi6BkhPfOZ1lGDSJQMfbLsTMrbBX0Fk8i5h7BZNtTCL/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHS74U6Slk2IqaGPlJsTM2DVL1vImR+CFUyAF8VlO8WRPVFO8ILVntFGsDrV2ybQRtNL7// X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:650e:b0:1db:3004:aa9f with SMTP id b14-20020a170902650e00b001db3004aa9fmr2349384plk.5.1707914596351; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 04:43:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707914596; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nMbjdUFADub6RyJFbl2uKITzKsPdTjFlScf2e5/WIgxtk/ajlb9JxjvtTvTjrwSSce ZwEW4hOop0wT2Q0YssGIVcbnJpd535JWlhCeDZu1D1pzVNgBguI/gz5ZuLrBq3SbodyA hGXbWWAnoOZFV6FIiUyoB2kCvlTdQDePfTJqqiBsLeDZBoDxCE4Olz6EOiyWywmH+62M KxwvNWQf9uonZXjxk3k6tnWBT7wLlmn+t964+aYxiQ+1UOoLrsVm6vD9hCLGAtRA113r G1MK67miXkDhZerUh0w9SuK9zItcgKTVfU9B8jiu8T7nN0EWp8fgieePDiktno+q5lQZ o1Sw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id; bh=CA1p7Qj+u+Osb6u4xUluH21vpUT3d8412157s2SvNbU=; fh=LPWzRasByTsqb8+6yCR1/ShCEp+0o/qmOUMW8Hqqdz8=; b=MyZ7h1nUr4a8jnHVTT0pi4b4qErXE89tLM2iBz9Ezg/tCA5RCGhfttfGHnhO+oUVmf +djHDhxzdurEBoHS77EymNiWIYb5DYxrnpJzJNx2QY+zOMRfmr77XRSNo0mJUG6/Lpfu WUXIkdo6DZJ1ICO7btSrWXI3yYrisNoGe8c5awCP355qEyyF3zHn5fgFbZc4IpA2RrQF iVuA0IItn1peiJJPheyVoTcDONg5vk7b30uBL8oLF6Sa5hSMR55XTD0GmC/Z7B8Nio74 YLhhDdhPABwAjhfVbJ/KCbOVUoif6b1mwlg7WqugEQtUJxnvXoGMXua13PG+tbCXFEqw eOVA==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65209-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-65209-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xs4all.nl X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVYVHfFtMmH1G7ce8WbVhKdOg7zXDrIcBf80w8I0sos1kvbeTCJN+UqDm4qA0Xg1E2SAV45w1UrpEJ7GU3rUMc2ztLDeE2GAzEve2HyIA== Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n5-20020a170902d2c500b001db2c70dd28si3242985plc.477.2024.02.14.04.43.16 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Feb 2024 04:43:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65209-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65209-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-65209-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xs4all.nl Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ACC3290009 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:43:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A385E52F94; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2853048CCC; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707914579; cv=none; b=R3IbV7kY9g6gwj4heC1lirUolmvx6FZldRBOhir2Q7Zk7Nt5dAnFtxvYV4grkY6WpmrT20284t11gE9dhuRilPTTrqCMBRYf9ecXurQ1C6A2EAYR3aaMNw+/iEPL3Me/0E8lt96s//ULDPVqIaHlC9nFb4NEgfveBbw3CXt2Jfg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707914579; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jxmlOviVwF7abdnEw/5MzSSrj9/prgdLL0S3wz8HToQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XBoyp6FLzxoy08MHQygwe6cs78bgFpODq8F1aLufxS83wjY9kafcVXBlSAyjXt6+q7t4JFuBFS4v9NpAiAYNS2E7+iglr4MCIpxv/x0hQO5Vv60KMIG7AY4pEK1tufQQSQQpOnTou//ZMcbW7zRtJ4kAHwg4rsbgvmS87IGzQxY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E4CCC43390; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 12:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3e5b41c0-1249-4546-a146-7c832cbfff28@xs4all.nl> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:42:55 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: v4l: marvell: select CONFIG_V4L2_ASYNC where needed Content-Language: en-US, nl To: Arnd Bergmann , Sakari Ailus Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab References: <20240213095555.454392-1-arnd@kernel.org> <24cbf7b2-a091-440e-92cc-5c9828d52260@xs4all.nl> <2027d488-a245-4492-bc17-27e17af575fd@app.fastmail.com> <6067898e-eaac-4266-b4a3-388db9a918fa@xs4all.nl> <7ec182c6-bd52-4433-bf06-dbc71f186184@app.fastmail.com> From: Hans Verkuil In-Reply-To: <7ec182c6-bd52-4433-bf06-dbc71f186184@app.fastmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 14/02/2024 11:58, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024, at 11:54, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 14/02/2024 11:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >>> It was definitely working before ff3cc65cadb5 ("media: v4l: async, >>> fwnode: Improve module organisation") in linux-5.13, but it's not >>> clear if that is the culprit. It's probably safe to backport >>> to v5.15 and higher. >> >> >> If it has been broken for so long, then should we bother with v6.8? >> >> I'm not saying we should, I just like to get your opinion on this. > > I don't have a strong opinion either way, there is very little > risk and very little benefit in backporting. > > If we apply it to 6.8 at all, I think it should also be in > v5.15+ LTS and vice versa, but only queuing it for 6.9 is > fine with me, too. OK, I'll just take this patch as-is for v6.9. I'm preparing a PR anyway, so I'll include this patch. Thank you for the quick replies! Hans > > Arnd