Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65245-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1707524971-146908-1-git-send-email-quic_obabatun@quicinc.com> <1707524971-146908-2-git-send-email-quic_obabatun@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <1707524971-146908-2-git-send-email-quic_obabatun@quicinc.com>
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 21:03:49 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5f5e-cCaX7Gr20oG8F-aywJcosLn4ajxx2SQWoB8JtSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] loongarch: Call arch_mem_init() before
 platform_init() in the init sequence
To: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@quicinc.com>
Cc: jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi, shorne@gmail.com, 
	ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, 
	robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, linux-openrisc@vger.kernel.org, 
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@quicinc.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, Oreoluwa,

On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 8:29=E2=80=AFAM Oreoluwa Babatunde
<quic_obabatun@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> The platform_init() function which is called during device bootup
> contains a few calls to memblock_alloc().
> This is an issue because these allocations are done before reserved
> memory regions are set aside in arch_mem_init().
> This means that there is a possibility for memblock to allocate memory
> from any of the reserved memory regions.
>
> Hence, move the call to arch_mem_init() to be earlier in the init
> sequence so that all reserved memory is set aside before any allocations
> are made with memblock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.=
c
> index edf2bba..66c307c 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -597,8 +597,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>         parse_early_param();
>         reserve_initrd_mem();
>
> -       platform_init();
>         arch_mem_init(cmdline_p);
> +       platform_init();
Thank you for your patch, but I think we cannot simply exchange their
order. If I'm right, you try to move all memblock_reserve() as early
as possible, but both arch_mem_init() and platform_init() call
memblock_reserve(), we should do a complete refactor for this. And
since it works with the existing order, we can simply keep it as is
now.

Huacai

>
>         resource_init();
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> --