Received: by 2002:a05:7412:2a91:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id u17csp651743rdh; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:39:18 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCUNYqxrhSOM4dB7kRGFYkc/SOxTxwrOTUZkqdEuYH6lKsUHlPB3NDjPOXdGLJGQy4qFSVggQRR4ZzFWYnvhWRN5arp7etnA8gs/XJbDJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFBxfuKBTV7FQO3H9jCYHU3acsECX/bPYwiYiafA0x2FLtDpopZMeMxxYOAuEcjvNs2QIVT X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:7404:b0:178:75f5:33e6 with SMTP id s4-20020a056358740400b0017875f533e6mr2796347rwg.19.1707925158648; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:39:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1707925158; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=feYlqKSSkl4Ft9bPEZwP97CLDD7T8u5hptz+yZ0pu8TpNTzILeRsWpctL4fPAcJFOs fKfdzIX4jm3+fwu1NOcHiTAFY9ppYmueDcBgNzw3dwc1CAyXc3eSw68KLFZyAfP1pAiq JBxX2LSGxfwoLnFlSRNwSAKitY+1wpA3yu07mHDEZMxsdgQQBEDjdzlaeCl6dKN8GuxA /juBtBc9LOwamAeyK5Kb6ydFuMdw5dVp8MQeE60jlyybcCnDc2E69NlgeS7PKXRTMn6M 0FTJodGHVqFMecs07Eb8h/mrUJOjqqvDpyAL7vzBRf5pPxvbGKFux5Q5HEJ+q6G9eprM 9fOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=mZOL4Irb7MNo7n1EzHCG69P4skijmBZNv8jNo9b1KCs=; fh=zDJeXniCK5lBxtQGpbTVkNIojRXFZSRK1lvUmfaWr2k=; b=rC/O74LzF++LmN1FCmaG5DhxMdE0P1b4x8Mw5rHP737r+mN+8U2nX0YZpSdHlgLu8S fEGUg8D8zWDvwLo5MP9gRozAZP6qWosznyM8FRD1AaCmOVVcV7xbVwdJMIWdQxbZrft6 ZbScbaJ9k9kHD3sssR9wvvUvVA8xKzgYWgUYjGnqBWw3ntMRe60EB5ldhtRZK6JCGObs OnPyo0dzKtvTnElUYGZ4ZEomE1IsRf5YSk+vMnlXZMISp7OIZInl1ZlwQ0NRkepH58d/ GGNpzR9BiyG/nXYdtbuWWI1caLuVmBNqvKi8GUzm67byUlrZP0QP9La2UPzZnGAG27hm mGXw==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=dlx3Kdn8; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=intel.com dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65439-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-65439-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVgOz65dEzq51lrfmG3waFqo9+G394uAyF/iRos4WpyHwideg6VyqcJGiVP8XyAzrp1PPMZ5zHMx5ME9P2nJcW6hEGsT5+zpeIw/UKrNw== Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c15-20020a05622a058f00b0042da946f7fcsi5398264qtb.687.2024.02.14.07.39.18 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:39:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65439-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=dlx3Kdn8; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=intel.com dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65439-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-65439-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6600E1C20993 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385D85D8EF; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dlx3Kdn8" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F015CDC9; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707925141; cv=none; b=SjwJDmS7U3UVcRDa3uiaia1H/Hndcl5/9hGWBUkjWlyUfHCALq8hs+0N7axs/EUqpWqaTUTOH2b2NQCmzGe7f7TDX31duacW2ORd9uzr03NYwkrj9734OYtOXqD7W3xFuVeoSRb9aMPiuriI6cq3Xz0ifi6+xvq96sXJWk+qBcw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707925141; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j9jvXH0vsZH1F67chvjpprea3OfhpV6nIJl3B4ccIIY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=haAOukt+HlvI6atltG2cO2BU1NJhJ+rac3eW2+SufMkp5ki3RMTh71LuNyoxal6jgoo7hzRlk6DoS3+nwf8HQEBTA7D4qDeYrjUxJO6dn90QgblskZ/9X5a+NVRII9ywqDMYoeROlpw5W0MhknWRC8dtRFeSfJ/cG4JEsLQVNVI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dlx3Kdn8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707925139; x=1739461139; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=j9jvXH0vsZH1F67chvjpprea3OfhpV6nIJl3B4ccIIY=; b=dlx3Kdn8fse6qckoACTj92+ZxDnKNxTTFxdEEeJyaSaXMDNAf7cdihvP S4+0CAIF0gFlk6VqzlvPuQ/n8T/OHGqDHMcvRNZf1lADEjXG49mQr+U6A XFFmiQMLAkWEox6QhIhRv4Iu/Ne9thKEPUJf3bzB+k7TkGIy6yP0Ug9rL yIp0nPPIBPhPOJxN1Hsu6kM6F9yolIVW2MIBX2DZrFVF5F7N23UL00Vmj dlNxC6hjulEBY9n5bNBPoymoMV0Ww78C0VA4wDoH10Wl7G/wQ/QeO7LSG A0N/cj5gqOCRhVPCG5HxtR1hcnWS0edV2R1fZJg/WTS6Z8NQ3rj7Wxsiy g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10984"; a="2118380" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,159,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2118380" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2024 07:38:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,159,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="34281480" Received: from newjersey.igk.intel.com ([10.102.20.203]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Feb 2024 07:38:56 -0800 From: Alexander Lobakin To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Alexander Lobakin , =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , Martin KaFai Lau , Jakub Kicinski , Maciej Fijalkowski , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf/test_run: increase Page Pool's ptr_ring size in live frames mode Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:38:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20240214153838.4159970-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Currently, when running xdp-trafficgen, test_run creates page_pools with the ptr_ring size of %NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT (64). This might work fine if XDP Tx queues are polled with the budget limitation. However, we often clear them with no limitation to ensure maximum free space when sending. For example, in ice and idpf (upcoming), we use "lazy" cleaning, i.e. we clean XDP Tx queue only when the free space there is less than 1/4 of the queue size. Let's take the ring size of 512 just as an example. 3/4 of the ring is 384 and often times, when we're entering the cleaning function, we have this whole amount ready (or 256 or 192, doesn't matter). Then we're calling xdp_return_frame_bulk() and after 64th frame, page_pool_put_page_bulk() starts returning pages to the page allocator due to that the ptr_ring is already full. put_page(), alloc_page() et at starts consuming a ton of CPU time and leading the board of the perf top output. Let's not limit ptr_ring to 64 for no real reason and allow more pages to be recycled. Just don't put anything to page_pool_params::size and let the Page Pool core pick the default of 1024 entries (I don't believe there are real use cases to clean more than that amount of descriptors). After the change, the MM layer disappears from the perf top output and all pages get recycled to the PP. On my test setup on idpf with the default ring size (512), this gives +80% of Tx performance with no visible memory consumption increase. Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index dfd919374017..1ad4f1ddcb88 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@ static int xdp_test_run_setup(struct xdp_test_data *xdp, struct xdp_buff *orig_c struct page_pool_params pp_params = { .order = 0, .flags = 0, - .pool_size = xdp->batch_size, .nid = NUMA_NO_NODE, .init_callback = xdp_test_run_init_page, .init_arg = xdp, -- 2.43.0