Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65705-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:43:13 +0000
Message-ID: <86y1bn3pse.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] KVM: arm64: Improvements to LPI injection
In-Reply-To: <20240213093250.3960069-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
References: <20240213093250.3960069-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/29.1
 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:32:37 +0000,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> For full details on the what/why, please see the cover letter in v1.
> 
> Apologies for the delay on v2, I wanted to spend some time to get a
> microbenchmark in place to slam the ITS code pretty hard, and based on
> the results I'm glad I did.

[...]

Buglets and potential improvements aside, I like the smell of this. At
least the first handful of patches could easily be taken as a separate
improvement series.

Let me know how you'd like to play this.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.