Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-65790-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:12:19 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Tim Lunn <tim@feathertop.org>
Cc: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	Chris Morgan <macromorgan@hotmail.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
	David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Ondrej Jirman <megi@xff.cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tianling Shen <cnsztl@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix vendor strings on Rockchip boards
Message-ID: <20240214-moocher-womanless-21201b67b76d@spud>
References: <20240214040731.3069111-1-tim@feathertop.org>
 <c03220db663279c9e83bab81f3d829e7@manjaro.org>
 <e952d127-b12d-4b5a-838b-807a876db707@feathertop.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xM0QSn4CMXaJ9cxt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e952d127-b12d-4b5a-838b-807a876db707@feathertop.org>


--xM0QSn4CMXaJ9cxt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:27:08PM +1100, Tim Lunn wrote:
> Hi Dragan,
>=20
> On 2/14/24 15:14, Dragan Simic wrote:
> > Hello Tim,
> >=20
> > On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote:
> > > A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip
> > > when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip.
> > >=20
> > > Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer
> >=20
> > Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible"
> > strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel cod=
e,
> > such as in some drivers?
> >=20
> Yes I checked that, there are no remaining references to the old/incorrect
> compatible strings in kernel code

What about other code? Like a BSD or a bootloader? If nothing is using
them
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Fixes tags I think wouldn't go amiss, but I'm not expecting a resend
with them.

Cheers,
Conor.

--xM0QSn4CMXaJ9cxt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZc0CgwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0rnIAP4266uBVs8L2WyYwA8DkZLeNbpLCOsYZojqX3g8t5zn2QEAmlVsc/c21nrD
IOXryV8IFMuPO4v9U4rwGrS6mo9QQQ4=
=kr05
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xM0QSn4CMXaJ9cxt--