Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-66374-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240211101421.166779-1-warthog618@gmail.com> <20240215010733.GA30995@rigel>
In-Reply-To: <20240215010733.GA30995@rigel>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:46:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdrkCp2xMq4_Qa3i-tMNUL0=x8ubSRgGjRJHWPzw3=KAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default_values being logical
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, 
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, andy@kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:07=E2=80=AFAM Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 06:14:21PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > The documentation for default_values mentions high/low which can be
> > confusing, particularly when the ACTIVE_LOW flag is set.
> >
> > Replace high/low with active/inactive to clarify that the values are
> > logical not physical.
> >
> > Similarly, clarify the interpretation of values in struct gpiohandle_da=
ta.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
>
> Just checking where we are at with this patch, given you've merged the
> two documentation patches that followed on from it.
>
> I realize you have bigger fish to fry at the moment, so sorry for any
> distraction, but I just want to ensure there isn't something you are
> expecting from me or it hasn't fallen through the cracks.
>
> Cheers,
> Kent.

Now queued. I had skimmed through the discussion and was under the
impression that you'll be sending a v2 of this one, sorry.

Bart