Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-66386-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:07:42 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
	<Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>, <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	<rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>, <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	<jacob.e.keller@intel.com>, <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Add spinlock for frame
 transmission from CPU
Message-ID: <20240215080742.t2yswxegwob34ouy@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com>
References: <20240213121705.4070598-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
 <5476743f-3648-4038-97f8-a9df22c0f507@gmail.com>
 <20240214081442.w533wvcvqpvq5352@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com>
 <20240214070908.37b49ddf@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240214070908.37b49ddf@kernel.org>

The 02/14/2024 07:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:14:42 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > > Any reason you targeted 'net-next' rather than 'net', as this appears to
> > > be clearly a bug fix here?
> >
> > Yes, it is a bug but it is not something that happens all the
> > time and I thought this fits more into the lines of 'This could be a
> > problem ...' therefore I had targeted 'net-next'.
> > But if you consider that I should target 'net' instead of 'net-next' I
> > can do that.
> 
> Definitely a bug fix worthy of net, yes, please.

Perfect, I will do that.

> 

-- 
/Horatiu