Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-66622-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Message-ID: <447f4279-aea9-4f35-b87e-a3fc8c6c20ac@xen0n.name>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:25:54 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] LoongArch: Add pv ipi support on LoongArch VM
Content-Language: en-US
From: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
To: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
 Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240201031950.3225626-1-maobibo@loongson.cn>
 <0f4d83e2-bff9-49d9-8066-9f194ce96306@xen0n.name>
In-Reply-To: <0f4d83e2-bff9-49d9-8066-9f194ce96306@xen0n.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2/15/24 18:11, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply (and Happy Chinese New Year), and thanks for 
> providing microbenchmark numbers! But it seems the more comprehensive 
> CoreMark results were omitted (that's also absent in v3)? While the 

Of course the benchmark suite should be UnixBench instead of CoreMark. 
Lesson: don't multi-task code reviews, especially not after consuming 
beer -- a cup of coffee won't fully cancel the influence. ;-)

-- 
WANG "xen0n" Xuerui

Linux/LoongArch mailing list: https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/