Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-66821-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:39:17 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Petr =?utf-8?B?VGVzYcWZw61r?= <petr@tesarici.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>,
	Larry Dewey <larry.dewey@amd.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@amd.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>,
	Marc =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E8le?= La France <tsi@tuyoix.net>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	"Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
	Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
	Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] sbm: SandBox Mode documentation
Message-ID: <2024021534-antibody-routing-466e@gregkh>
References: <20240214113035.2117-6-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com>
 <20240214053053.982b48d993ae99dad1d59020@linux-foundation.org>
 <2024021425-audition-expand-2901@gregkh>
 <20240214155524.719ffb15@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
 <2024021415-jokester-cackle-2923@gregkh>
 <20240214173112.138e0e29@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
 <2024021417-magma-drudge-ad70@gregkh>
 <20240214204254.6208ca2f@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
 <2024021514-manmade-ambitious-414a@gregkh>
 <20240215104515.2075577e@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20240215104515.2075577e@meshulam.tesarici.cz>

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:45:15AM +0100, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> As a matter of fact, hpa does not like the x86 implementation. For
> reasons that I do not fully understand (yet), but if the concept turns
> out to be impractical, then my submission will serve a purpose, as I
> can save myself (and anybody else with a similar idea) a lot of work by
> failing fast.
> 
> Is this a valid way to get early feedback?

Asking for feedback is one thing (that's what RFC is for, right?), but
submitting something and expecting us to review and accept it as-is like
this, just doesn't work well.

thanks,

greg k-h