Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-66978-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	=?UTF-8?q?Niklas=20S=C3=B6derlund?= <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: [PATCH resend] selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: Adapt progress to kselftest framework
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:28:17 +0100
Message-Id: <7960007c8517109b592995ad10a3058fbe5aae75.1708003520.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

When adapting the test to the kselftest framework, a few printf() calls
indicating test progress were not updated.

Fix this by replacing these printf() calls by ksft_print_msg() calls.

Fixes: ce7d101750ff8450 ("selftests: timers: clocksource-switch: adapt to kselftest framework")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
When just running the test, the output looks like:

    # Validating clocksource arch_sys_counter
    TAP version 13
    1..12
    ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
    ...
    # Validating clocksource ffca0000.timer
    TAP version 13
    1..12
    ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
    ...

When redirecting the test output to a file, the progress prints are not
interspersed with the test output, but collated at the end:

    TAP version 13
    1..12
    ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
    ...
    TAP version 13
    1..12
    ok 1 CLOCK_REALTIME
    ...
    # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:6 error:0
    # Validating clocksource arch_sys_counter
    # Validating clocksource ffca0000.timer
    ...

This makes it hard to match the test results with the timer under test.
Is there a way to fix this?  The test does use fork().

Thanks!
---
 tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c
index c5264594064c8516..83faa4e354e389c2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/clocksource-switch.c
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	/* Check everything is sane before we start switching asynchronously */
 	if (do_sanity_check) {
 		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
-			printf("Validating clocksource %s\n",
-				clocksource_list[i]);
+			ksft_print_msg("Validating clocksource %s\n",
+					clocksource_list[i]);
 			if (change_clocksource(clocksource_list[i])) {
 				status = -1;
 				goto out;
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 	}
 
-	printf("Running Asynchronous Switching Tests...\n");
+	ksft_print_msg("Running Asynchronous Switching Tests...\n");
 	pid = fork();
 	if (!pid)
 		return run_tests(runtime);
-- 
2.34.1