Received: by 2002:a05:7412:1e0b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id kr11csp481234rdb; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:15:47 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVdFHjMnlMlIzvzu0dFlifXggrCCl5t1Azh/gtHBdEo1at6C/2p/ZL9tcZ34keGo3A+oy1yZASJBwJObc2xybOHQO9THUu7e6nYzpfLMQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGon57OzSlmRNNxeggTqVq6eppNB29xG7oy4jtJN/J16ogo9q7jxvPiQY6Wd7CCZ8n5tWyF X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db09:b0:1da:1b60:2209 with SMTP id m9-20020a170902db0900b001da1b602209mr2168864plx.44.1708006547570; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:15:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p12-20020a170902ebcc00b001db6a6c2925si1210798plg.308.2024.02.15.06.15.46 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Feb 2024 06:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67035-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=XHT2UyBt; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67035-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-67035-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CBD8292A2E for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01917131E29; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XHT2UyBt" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4E258ABC; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708005450; cv=none; b=iXcIa8eYORXYyT9Hw3j0u7kolnt7q7H88/T5uQzeIYmVYshUDRY6n/QZrwO9nyDm1GBdNMmY/HkliAlOP3xTnwjiItFiP2fzU7cW4oVE8Kezehoghi27kjZAlAepb0C7gE/r1TwDEZAWVJuF52pDzoAENd6ygv9JSK46hmrhVss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708005450; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qX8uFgsdsrj52VOCLla5Dzge8AOEWRLR3S6SAVVCBws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MFgYLhQhD17lq6PDyIuAOlw4fPnKCPCvYvUqeltsrnUzdsTzOtt8dIT4sMCicjRyVJ4OhktQ2+1s6DdOIGIK4Y5zoaD7mo+65llHEdCT4x6NBwhuUQ9U2d+PXwp/SD3/vG1zePQxyenPdbjr/Ic3di9NfRLrH7c40Pd8lHR+OwQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XHT2UyBt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708005449; x=1739541449; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=qX8uFgsdsrj52VOCLla5Dzge8AOEWRLR3S6SAVVCBws=; b=XHT2UyBth5AGYqISbDE1ajyy0vJy/3it9jghYrCar3HNy1CSHm0nIWyn Sena2gJSbe6XKIXJe38/ESdDxOyujO+13NOfAjf0ern4xkh6S3Gf13Gyn gE8Ohq24OSJAhYzi2A2kqTBHRGi1MaG7tuJgvdWIvxOikmHMEA0xtCFxM bjVgHp1F6gZrlYe2naQhSei1YNWBnjPjxVzIZ5Dj2pQyN6vprdMwpxq4s 9zaKcS8tb9S91ZC4Gc5XqPWalpixVXlBLhMlm3DL0lVyB7/mWGlm3TL8M a1MQ8RtQWzeJTuOWWg5lPbo+UnmxXrfM6BhnCQ3+nctcuXpPlqUs+slx+ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10984"; a="5920031" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,161,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="5920031" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2024 05:57:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10984"; a="912169572" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,161,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="912169572" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2024 05:57:25 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1racEs-00000004nyr-33bb; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:57:22 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:57:22 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robin van der Gracht , Paul Burton Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/15] auxdisplay: linedisp: Group line display drivers together Message-ID: References: <20240212170423.2860895-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240212170423.2860895-8-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:35:32PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:30 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:05:00AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: .. > > I can add blank lines to follow the same grouping as in Kconfig. Would it > > work for you? > > Unlike Kconfig, this is not user-visible. > Most Makefiles use sorted entries. If they look unsorted, people will > just add new entries at the end. Wouldn't be easy to catch at review phase? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko