Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67047-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:06:38 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding for ChromeOS EC
 GPIO controller
Message-ID: <20240215140638.GA4162082-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20240210070934.2549994-1-swboyd@chromium.org>
 <20240210070934.2549994-2-swboyd@chromium.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240210070934.2549994-2-swboyd@chromium.org>

On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:09:12PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The ChromeOS embedded controller (EC) supports setting the state of
> GPIOs when the system is unlocked, and getting the state of GPIOs in all
> cases. The GPIOs are on the EC itself, so the EC acts similar to a GPIO
> expander. Add a binding to describe these GPIOs in DT so that other
> devices described in DT can read the GPIOs on the EC.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
> Cc: <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev>
> Cc: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml          |  3 ++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a9f1d7784070
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: GPIOs controlled by ChromeOS EC
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> +
> +description:
> +  Google's ChromeOS EC has a gpio controller inside the Embedded Controller
> +  (EC) and controlled via a host-command interface. The node for this
> +  device should be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi.

Why do we need a child node here? 

Rob