Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67192-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:30:44 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
	theo.lebrun@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	u-kumar1@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/18] i2c: omap: wakeup the controller during
 suspend() callback
Message-ID: <Zc4uJBUuBzpNgxDP@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v3-0-5c2e4a3fac1f@bootlin.com>
 <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v3-4-5c2e4a3fac1f@bootlin.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v3-4-5c2e4a3fac1f@bootlin.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:17:49PM +0100, Thomas Richard wrote:
> A device may need the controller up during suspend_noirq() or
> resume_noirq().
> But if the controller is autosuspended, there is no way to wakeup it during
> suspend_noirq() or resume_noirq() because runtime pm is disabled at this
> time.
> 
> The suspend() callback wakes up the controller, so it is available until
> its suspend_noirq() callback (pm_runtime_force_suspend()).
> During the resume, it's restored by resume_noirq() callback
> (pm_runtime_force_resume()). Then resume() callback enables autosuspend.
> 
> So the controller is up during a little time slot in suspend and resume
> sequences even if it's not used.

..

> +	/*
> +	 * If the controller is autosuspended, there is no way to wakeup it once
> +	 * runtime pm is disabled (in suspend_late()).
> +	 * But a device may need the controller up during suspend_noirq() or
> +	 * resume_noirq().
> +	 * Wakeup the controller while runtime pm is enabled, so it is available until
> +	 * its suspend_noirq(), and from resume_noirq().
> +	 */

It's a bit random line lengths...
Can you repack this to be more condensed?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko