Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 09:24:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 09:24:24 -0500 Received: from inreach-gw1.idiom.com ([209.209.13.26]:43529 "EHLO smile.idiom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 09:24:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3C307464.2253E26@obviously.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 09:21:24 -0500 From: Bryce Nesbitt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Lionel Bouton , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Subject: Re: Why would a valid DVD show zero files on Linux? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > Does anyone want the first few K of this DVD to see why the autodetection > > is not working better? Do you want me to upgrade past Kernel 2.4.2-2 first? > > Is RedHat 7.2's kernel good enough? > > The autodetection is working. Your DVD has a UDF file system on it and a > blank iso9660 one. Understood. However, why can't that combination "just work"? Changing /etc/fstab every time I switch between sticking in a CD-ROM and DVD-ROM is not cool. Certainly that "other operating system" does not make me do that. A disk with a blank iso9660 plus a full UDF ought to automatically mount UDF, no? How hard would that be to detect? -Bryce PS: I manually mount anyway, and only have two DVD-ROMs, so it's not such a big deal for me. But as DVD rom becomes more popular it could get inconvienent. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/