Received: by 2002:a05:7412:1e0b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id kr11csp689473rdb; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:11:06 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCUJ6ct9RAr6QLRuCC4Xr/hk90/NpZU7JvZz4wEuu7wXjpKM+gML5FKLQiI7YnKcqXdxpieZ3k+cWkIAmmqm85oRc6658W2uVum7zQLfbw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFLJOdeUmklCytZNZV7knIbBELEhtthEgdP5iGnvQtHDNHxbBsX8GmyIXi506Km9wTQ+9c8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:808a:b0:19e:c777:5c6c with SMTP id c10-20020a056a20808a00b0019ec7775c6cmr2418706pza.19.1708027866138; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:11:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708027866; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zoDEgyKydHA0+Ac+FNA5LE30YJGaFvb4dE6BiTGqqZWVaUewopuAfu9FMiCkiG82Ux usO6JCbnAHcdx/6w42elVwG9yblMqGZID3qBjQhPyT57wjN2raVrFS8f9xqpdAcVnUnN ChO0/oAvmr+JjLQTYSzj89BMOj5Y9Hgabcu2SO3t3tXNJlYK1VkPxTuK5Jgjs6NyYDvw 35TVYpdZzAei5VhpeBHy3liDoVhScDZwOlLk6TMcA6WdW4L6xwqbzxSuqU4zc2/l2M8V H9bRxUisGLxTbIJnC22zX/9oxro0JUczNkhHoxhapPPSAhkmUlKxgzCOqw7ED2UWQK/u foVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe :list-id:precedence; bh=V5QgqQoXz8wizig56vqi0Oac+indEXSPpBlHYNqWGu8=; fh=R1Gz1y0HHm9/wBy5p/1N8sn0N1vn1alQrryEEnxZJZk=; b=PQuaDSzn3FJ//a2vkb4xIfDy0HchAQGobQEeYMrJJJHiZpAxeJzGSEmpXukL1wluA6 xOLCGDIyq8rexPg9/6ApuY/6gm7vOO2FlaLYfWf452w46Hp2zQVEzyghuFuU5eR3TGyV lMUPWIIxuuwj7nKeEJdmHEOXvmUpQ6FMKjzGHHLMH0vLJ8RlCBoMc8kfVP3JhpZXCI7W WSFwZyK60YSgzSQDeWKE6EE/fBiTzRQHtfGyTRSjalVP7ykK61pZ15qXc9dj4yNfhSXn hSdXaOrr2VZktSr7b5D26/tPdL4sNj6cAZoNtDdLhQ0LdZFMbE25yg4Sb16TWkLnIGjs +rxQ==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67637-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-67637-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5-20020a636205000000b005dc87643cd1si1604385pgb.138.2024.02.15.12.11.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:11:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67637-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67637-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-67637-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFA1286C48 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D4413AA4A; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oo1-f41.google.com (mail-oo1-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21D241A81; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.41 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708027853; cv=none; b=YGFZkw/RsnK/PXvvGZ6Jtzt7/BL23h5pElCyILpUTz27GGMDHqeEfC4MUnmW3oWRVZ7BlQDw96F5Fm2LE8T0Xn2SOfaRg0Z5eDhjeavdrHZqpRp4N+ceAl75PaDcPb2kH1gg1ls6+x06+/iHWWxahuAJmq/1myyOaq7ZdatwKgE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708027853; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KWacMN9bKt8TXc2E1qM1MQU5P2gj1Hsam/+L01L4dKc=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=TykVS5OdMk5BbnOKWlkH8tz6sZ8dQlTo8yB+EIzNTEWRphLtucsHyWnDM1qTxuOboP+atylSAaJlikSuAPCsWS2UeEAezgZdv0EieRWBT5Dmhpq0cGHPD4lZAGzMVzwn+5yNXcCijn2/09/00TJATWk6STqYrVPivWcPuNm1VV4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.41 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-oo1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-59d8455a001so164702eaf.0; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:10:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708027851; x=1708632651; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V5QgqQoXz8wizig56vqi0Oac+indEXSPpBlHYNqWGu8=; b=UY3NiuWZk29xW0BRkoQ44vxNCLg/rvszwHUxKby9x63trdrYtydkVvUY1/tZntEDm1 MQoWWHZJFbAWEsH8XINTXww38aHxyvyFovq2Y6gwvXmrRZXLdE+71HKA3iix+/cSpkxt k8S6HA1Yt3HlSM0WHdWYwihrK4Ac+1w9Kv4ZJWHiDSrfuLx3XwvpEN+m/We5q1wkDaAv BeoHX7sq5EU1ShxYwk6TBwjNKI5e1F9C86J5/i+TC9rz7ispJxKSzkcpWaQJ8njBm+Xv Y6eV2+dcM9acxfVhvu5MvlLvxShPy1k5R6QJwauZTXiCqPB8EIZRz/TrGx2l6oTCbbUe yZ3w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUqeQiV2wpLNTEY3QFABvo47g6vaDGT2Fu9HcTyuuNs+lkHq+HBeGjbqKGUdplB6kRXRBYAENgPLYfbS4vudJHiY/O1R/VtN0EzdZV7XYmrfTfqiiA/zVPzr+p3Sw1kXJDVZO2mLntUR2VjE33rpqAW9E47tEwDsbC5Sp3FcjgZPgGo7oLJCqiVekl6Y2dXcDq7cBC6xMfpKvKt6FDeCQT+gdJSvzQRFO2DN5jtpCmO88UdcH/t111L/N8qO7v3RLEOhoHiTnIkiRakaYhni1YRfJSFrWaL9LWsI9SMNLE2hrHSfQ0adbOZMxJg5NYW6L7OioLQCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyIV4HBAGGNY9mQelxNqloQxUZ+6Ov8iWHXXclIA0UUe6wn9L34 nfSeVrmGC0vCvBzY/jm9V8TsnNu/1vbjDv3hOwaX1Jkzgrgq/qCJbtblKnVg6AshSS3D6dwOV78 6wtCkQ9+gZJvkDti+z0QG1B8Au5g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:134d:b0:59f:881f:9318 with SMTP id b13-20020a056820134d00b0059f881f9318mr3192843oow.0.1708027850728; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:10:50 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:10:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 01/15] ACPI: Only enumerate enabled (or functional) processor devices To: Russell King Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, James Morse , Jonathan Cameron , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:49=E2=80=AFPM Russell King wrote: > > From: James Morse > > Today the ACPI enumeration code 'visits' all devices that are present. > > This is a problem for arm64, where CPUs are always present, but not > always enabled. When a device-check occurs because the firmware-policy > has changed and a CPU is now enabled, the following error occurs: > | acpi ACPI0007:48: Enumeration failure > > This is ultimately because acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration() returns > true for a device that is not enabled. The ACPI Processor driver > will not register such CPUs as they are not 'decoding their resources'. > > ACPI allows a device to be functional instead of maintaining the > present and enabled bit, but we can't simply check the enabled bit > for all devices since firmware can be buggy. > > If ACPI indicates that the device is present and enabled, then all well > and good, we can enumate it. However, if the device is present and not > enabled, then we also check whether the device is a processor device > to limit the impact of this new check to just processor devices. > > This avoids enumerating present && functional processor devices that > are not enabled. > > Signed-off-by: James Morse > Co-developed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) > --- > Changes since RFC v2: > * Incorporate comment suggestion by Gavin Shan. > Changes since RFC v3: > * Fixed "sert" typo. > Changes since RFC v3 (smaller series): > * Restrict checking the enabled bit to processor devices, update > commit comments. > * Use Rafael's suggestion in > https://lore.kernel.org/r/5760569.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher > * Updated with a fix - see: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zbe8WQRASx6D6RaG@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 11 +++++++++ > drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/internal.h | 4 ++- > drivers/acpi/property.c | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.= c > index 4fe2ef54088c..cf7c1cca69dd 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > @@ -626,6 +626,17 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = =3D { > }, > }; > > +bool acpi_device_is_processor(const struct acpi_device *adev) > +{ > + if (adev->device_type =3D=3D ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR) > + return true; > + > + if (adev->device_type !=3D ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE) > + return false; > + > + return acpi_scan_check_handler(adev, &processor_handler); > +} > + > static int acpi_processor_container_attach(struct acpi_device *dev, > const struct acpi_device_id *i= d) > { > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c > index 3b4d048c4941..e3c80f3b3b57 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c > @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ int acpi_bus_init_power(struct acpi_device *device) > return -EINVAL; > > device->power.state =3D ACPI_STATE_UNKNOWN; > - if (!acpi_device_is_present(device)) { > + if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(device)) { > device->flags.initialized =3D false; > return -ENXIO; > } > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c > index 23373faa35ec..a0256d2493a7 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int create_pnp_modalias(const struct acpi_devi= ce *acpi_dev, char *modalia > struct acpi_hardware_id *id; > > /* Avoid unnecessarily loading modules for non present devices. *= / > - if (!acpi_device_is_present(acpi_dev)) > + if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(acpi_dev)) > return 0; > > /* > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > index 6588525c45ef..1bc8b6db60c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h > +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ void acpi_sysfs_add_hotplug_profile(struct acpi_hotplug= _profile *hotplug, > int acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler= , > const char *hotplug_profile_name); > void acpi_scan_hotplug_enabled(struct acpi_hotplug_profile *hotplug, boo= l val); > +bool acpi_scan_check_handler(const struct acpi_device *adev, > + struct acpi_scan_handler *handler); > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS > extern struct dentry *acpi_debugfs_dir; > @@ -121,7 +123,6 @@ int acpi_device_setup_files(struct acpi_device *dev); > void acpi_device_remove_files(struct acpi_device *dev); > void acpi_device_add_finalize(struct acpi_device *device); > void acpi_free_pnp_ids(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp); > -bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev); > bool acpi_device_is_battery(struct acpi_device *adev); > bool acpi_device_is_first_physical_node(struct acpi_device *adev, > const struct device *dev); > @@ -133,6 +134,7 @@ int acpi_bus_register_early_device(int type); > const struct acpi_device *acpi_companion_match(const struct device *dev)= ; > int __acpi_device_uevent_modalias(const struct acpi_device *adev, > struct kobj_uevent_env *env); > +bool acpi_device_is_processor(const struct acpi_device *adev); > > /* ---------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > Power Resource > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c > index a6ead5204046..9f8d54038770 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c > @@ -1486,7 +1486,7 @@ static bool acpi_fwnode_device_is_available(const s= truct fwnode_handle *fwnode) > if (!is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) > return false; > > - return acpi_device_is_present(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode)); > + return acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode)= ); > } > > static const void * > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > index e6ed1ba91e5c..fd2e8b3a5749 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_device_check(struct acpi_device = *adev) > int error; > > acpi_bus_get_status(adev); > - if (acpi_device_is_present(adev)) { > + if (acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev)) { > /* > * This function is only called for device objects for wh= ich > * matching scan handlers exist. The only situation in w= hich > @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_bus_check(struct acpi_device *ad= ev, void *not_used) > int error; > > acpi_bus_get_status(adev); > - if (!acpi_device_is_present(adev)) { > + if (!acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(adev)) { > acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated(adev); > return 0; > } > @@ -1917,11 +1917,6 @@ static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_hand= le handle) > return true; > } > > -bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct acpi_device *adev) > -{ > - return adev->status.present || adev->status.functional; > -} > - > static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler= , > const char *idstr, > const struct acpi_device_id **matc= hid) > @@ -1942,6 +1937,18 @@ static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi= _scan_handler *handler, > return false; > } > > +bool acpi_scan_check_handler(const struct acpi_device *adev, > + struct acpi_scan_handler *handler) > +{ > + struct acpi_hardware_id *hwid; > + > + list_for_each_entry(hwid, &adev->pnp.ids, list) > + if (acpi_scan_handler_matching(handler, hwid->id, NULL)) > + return true; > + > + return false; > +} > + > static struct acpi_scan_handler *acpi_scan_match_handler(const char *ids= tr, > const struct acpi_device_id **mat= chid) > { > @@ -2405,16 +2412,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies); > * acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration - Check if the ACPI device is ready fo= r enumeration > * @device: Pointer to the &struct acpi_device to check > * > - * Check if the device is present and has no unmet dependencies. > + * Check if the device is functional or enabled and has no unmet depende= ncies. > * > - * Return true if the device is ready for enumeratino. Otherwise, return= false. > + * Return true if the device is ready for enumeration. Otherwise, return= false. > */ > bool acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration(const struct acpi_device *device) > { > if (device->flags.honor_deps && device->dep_unmet) > return false; > > - return acpi_device_is_present(device); > + /* > + * ACPI 6.5's 6.3.7 "_STA (Device Status)" allows firmware to ret= urn > + * (!present && functional) for certain types of devices that sho= uld be > + * enumerated. Note that the enabled bit should not be set unless= the > + * present bit is set. > + * > + * However, limit this only to processor devices to reduce possib= le > + * regressions with firmware. > + */ > + if (!device->status.present) > + return device->status.functional; > + > + /* > + * Fast path - if enabled is set, avoid the more expensive test t= o > + * check whether this device is a processor. > + */ > + if (device->status.enabled) > + return true; > + > + return !acpi_device_is_processor(device); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_ready_for_enumeration); > > -- I can queue this up for 6.9 as it looks like the rest of the series will still need some work. What do you think?