Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-67644-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:15:00 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] KVM: arm64: Improvements to LPI injection
Message-ID: <Zc5wxKnqHomScT2f@linux.dev>
References: <20240213093250.3960069-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev>
 <86y1bn3pse.wl-maz@kernel.org>
 <Zc0JG8pNRanuXzvR@linux.dev>
 <86jzn54u2e.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86jzn54u2e.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:37:45PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > I'd really like to de-risk the performance changes from the cleanups, as
> > I'm convinced they're going to have their own respective piles of bugs.
> > 
> > How does that sound?
> 
> Yup, I'd be on board with that. If you can respin the first part with
> bugs fixed and without the stats, that'd be great. We can further
> bikeshed on the rest in the 6.10 time frame.

Cool. That makes things much easier to manage. I'll respin the get / put
improvements shortly, and hopefully this time I actually fix the stupid
lock imbalance :)

> Also please Cc: Eric Auger, as he dealt with a lot of the ITS
> save/restore stuff.

Always happy to designate another victim to review my crap.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver