Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-68335-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 10:35:12 +0100
From: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com, jic23@kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de,
	thomas.haemmerle@leica-geosystems.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: ti,tmp117: add vcc supply binding
Message-ID: <20240216093512.bgbxavzw5cxai2nr@pengutronix.de>
References: <20240215204746.1197619-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
 <f42ebeb2-9ece-4e0d-b91d-4a0076fe7c8f@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f42ebeb2-9ece-4e0d-b91d-4a0076fe7c8f@kernel.org>

On 24-02-16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/02/2024 21:47, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > From: Thomas Haemmerle <thomas.haemmerle@leica-geosystems.com>
> > 
> > Add the binding to specify the vcc supply. We can't make it required
> > since this would break the backward compatibility.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Haemmerle <thomas.haemmerle@leica-geosystems.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Sure, sorry I forgot you guys. I was runing the script but only on the
driver not on the dt-bindings, since I was sending this series directly
from my git-branch without running git-format-patch nor..

> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of

using b4 either.

> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
> don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
> about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.
> 
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
> the process allowing the patch to be tested.
> 
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Sure, I will do. Thank you for the response anyway.

Regards,
  Marco

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>