Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-68777-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:03:37 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
	Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
	Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
	theo.lebrun@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	u-kumar1@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/18] phy: ti: phy-j721e-wiz: split wiz_clock_init()
 function
Message-ID: <Zc95SWxtfSQs0a0-@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v3-0-5c2e4a3fac1f@bootlin.com>
 <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v3-8-5c2e4a3fac1f@bootlin.com>
 <Zc4xJtLl3zo_YrBC@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <Zc76d4B4hjTC3xum@matsya>
 <14429802-b4d8-4a3e-88ea-a9fc55d2251c@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <14429802-b4d8-4a3e-88ea-a9fc55d2251c@ti.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:34:39PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> On 24/02/16 11:32AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 15-02-24, 17:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:17:53PM +0100, Thomas Richard wrote:

..

> > > (Side note, as this can be done later)
> > > 
> > > >  	if (rate >= 100000000)
> > > 
> > > > +		if (rate >= 100000000)
> > > 
> > > > +	if (rate >= 100000000)
> > > 
> > > I would make local definition and use it, we may get the global one as there
> > > are users.
> > > 
> > > #define HZ_PER_GHZ	1000000000UL
> > 
> > Better to define as:
> > #define HZ_PER_GHZ 1 * GIGA
> 
> The variable "rate" is being compared against 100 MHz and not 1 GHz.

Extremely good point why constant definitions are better (to avoid missing
or extra 0, etc)!

> The driver already has the following macros defined:
> #define REF_CLK_19_2MHZ         19200000
> #define REF_CLK_25MHZ           25000000
> #define REF_CLK_100MHZ          100000000
> #define REF_CLK_156_25MHZ       156250000
> 
> So would it be acceptable to change it to:
> 	if (rate >= REF_CLK_100MHZ)
> instead?

Sounds like a good idea to me.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko