Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754262AbXL1FSV (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:18:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751054AbXL1FSL (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:18:11 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:47420 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750958AbXL1FSK (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:18:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:18:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071227.211808.221171928.davem@davemloft.net> To: guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fib6_del_route has redundant code From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <477353B6.6000102@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <477353B6.6000102@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 976 Lines: 27 From: Gui Jianfeng Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:26:46 +0800 > I think the following code in fib6_del_route in the latest kernel is useless. > 1125 if (fn->leaf == NULL && fn->fn_flags&RTN_TL_ROOT) > 1126 fn->leaf = &ip6_null_entry; > > ip6_null_entry will never be unlinked from fn->leaf now, that is, > fn->leaf == NULL will never meet. I think you are right, but if it is true the next block of code is dead too: /* If it was last route, expunge its radix tree node */ if (fn->leaf == NULL) { fn->fn_flags &= ~RTN_RTINFO; rt6_stats.fib_route_nodes--; fn = fib6_repair_tree(fn); } But I am not completely convinced that all of these lines of code can be removed :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/