Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754887AbXL1I0A (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:26:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751977AbXL1IZs (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:25:48 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:64373 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751216AbXL1IZs (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:25:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4774B30B.3080507@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:25:47 +0800 From: Gui Jianfeng User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fib6_del_route has redundant code References: <477353B6.6000102@cn.fujitsu.com> <20071227.211808.221171928.davem@davemloft.net> <4774907D.5070806@cn.fujitsu.com> <20071228.001510.239311334.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20071228.001510.239311334.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1513 Lines: 43 > From: Gui Jianfeng > Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:58:21 +0800 > >>>> I think the following code in fib6_del_route in the latest kernel is useless. >>>> 1125 if (fn->leaf == NULL && fn->fn_flags&RTN_TL_ROOT) >>>> 1126 fn->leaf = &ip6_null_entry; >>>> >>>> ip6_null_entry will never be unlinked from fn->leaf now, that is, >>>> fn->leaf == NULL will never meet. >>> I think you are right, but if it is true the next block of >>> code is dead too: >>> >>> /* If it was last route, expunge its radix tree node */ >>> if (fn->leaf == NULL) { >>> fn->fn_flags &= ~RTN_RTINFO; >>> rt6_stats.fib_route_nodes--; >>> fn = fib6_repair_tree(fn); >>> } >>> >> I think this block of code can't be removed, because just the >> root(default route) fn->leaf always has ip6_null_entry on it. The >> normal fn->leaf becomes NULL when last route has been deleted, the >> radix tree should be expunged. > > But you said (still quoted above) that fn->leaf == NULL will not > occur. > > Do you mean this, only in the case that the RTN_TL_ROOT flag is set? yes, I mean this :-) > > I thought you meant always when the function is called, fn->leaf > cannot ever be NULL. its my fault, sorry for the inconvenient. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/