Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-70564-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <65d26191.050a0220.8ac8c.1e41@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:59:14 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com>,
	Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Puneet Gupta <puneet.gupta@amd.com>,
	Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@amd.com>,
	Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 2/6] net: phy: fill phy_id with C45 PHY
References: <20240218190034.15447-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <20240218190034.15447-3-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
 <ZdJcArE5/hXb1xFe@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZdJcArE5/hXb1xFe@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 07:35:30PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 08:00:28PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > With C45 PHYs that provide PHY ID in C45 Package regs, PHY device
> > .phy_id is not filled.
> 
> Intentionally so. Clause 45 PHYs don't have a single ID. Marvell
> 88X3310 is a case in point - there are at least two different vendor
> IDs in this PHY.
> 
> Trying to squash Clause 45 PHY IDs down to a single identifier is
> not sensible.
>

As said in the cover letter was something I notice and was curious if it
was intentional or not. Thanks for the clarification, I will drop.

-- 
	Ansuel