Received: by 2002:a05:7412:cfc7:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id by7csp850511rdb; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:26:52 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCX3YVBkygrjy02BOtsfbHndz/03BCNU6JDBJVGbHbMy9EzHkQOLH+lwREyobUJ9sNJL6bjt01JWA0Dh3fdL1VeM7NFPDVXgQPkTeRAhNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF0HxFYsSNkBFJOYKggrfRAQf88UYKVWHrR4P/eu55xtWAPWFqtnJ4RQV0NnVn+acAecSmj X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:82e:b0:607:9e7e:7d02 with SMTP id by14-20020a05690c082e00b006079e7e7d02mr10453807ywb.35.1708298812459; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:26:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4-20020ac860c4000000b0042dcfef6dcesi4830533qtm.254.2024.02.18.15.26.52 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:26:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-70620-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=N69duQ3r; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-70620-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-70620-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5891C20BD3 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 23:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DB47318D; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 23:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="N69duQ3r" Received: from mail-pg1-f174.google.com (mail-pg1-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90E8971B52; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 23:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708298803; cv=none; b=d4jL93apavsgffrKoEkyqsa+3WfSS9zyUkEmlb0aRO6jQIaRsG3hlac4EPHpQZ2LYKKXMqIhj3Zi3g5lc4CBzQJ1OORU551w0wFvgnH2otrdlB2WHX6VBrY25xu58itemJdeO6axzWbp8ZG2PCIHNGnReuHYnEwVlLaIgbOFL2s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708298803; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fYk+1gURJYpHdNPyMxphhkphfeGqjtQXJluEVlUYLuU=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=oV0j+6DOTyh5/n2+qcnmHG4jq9bIAYwEuxYf3IDryspkDr8qp0zekQAUxZlNfGvl2ReUdiGanOohk9L9Ha12geFfHrZMdmgT9oAY4K6OKTeZi9l4z6ymHVmJp2e7AaXRdA1Ln5xli4c5QEMlMSNJQocU+e2RRGM1/Qt1ZWSViR0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=N69duQ3r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pg1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5d3912c9a83so2786223a12.3; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:26:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708298801; x=1708903601; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nhTyD3n0vlZPBN9ggvTgDSqbeJoS4N+nJwoxfnz8ic4=; b=N69duQ3ryGlxIwp8DebR+A37950U/R18zZKUMMNI8kB/Rziv2aVvw0vbm9hN3is3os uSZzZPEw2MEnsx4bqgCJtD//7HLZ7SiJFMuNA3JkltQGaUvNpdPq0p8Guv9jhuxmNoEF vUKPS7kxfOUBOS1Kbir79fqU7Dq+uIJFKBaHyquu8Eiopn0ouCEUYs1cLrnmXxSvOC9a x66hwWm5VURaRg2aGPz8NCvjh4vJRq+lOjzvia3cq/xSWAGwBN0fFzFTqQNXm92GC7IP 7Y5eCHIGkavP9dA1hOqqAD25MA0qO/DXpHFr2zfcLisspQ85Cc1TDu9TCQHXEnhmuKaK y4PA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708298801; x=1708903601; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nhTyD3n0vlZPBN9ggvTgDSqbeJoS4N+nJwoxfnz8ic4=; b=ExhxUUaTR+MKzXPVfkUdlVbSzXaUat6NyoK8gGyy/ErtV9ahUqQ6+9VqtZGmBXOM7u mI+bYXUz/wxmq56YmHjPGo0I6iOb2r+q1p3IQjtDo5swyJO5rFbYqXjFaQvp727rHPmH H3M/6miwZ5dTIVXZKzhV3hK34+Sw6SG2kksQL4nN+OrQs8R8BMtb4l6f7iAb20q6xban DE25EraEoQzSpg4ezhkBi/f+ZBh4g5DeI6Kqgt6FDLp+Gmau3AC8LF8+CaBlCYEXnMyv 7LBz3bNZRRbXNemdSJ4QNN24PcngyFwRzTA3qqOMz7L+OeXXR08DiTBOGUQIMy+xSYhN 8b7A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWP/W9FAYSrgCjtAeMvEgb1g5MNU5jkcF/LcOmmT6EFJdqHdFGfKN/8O+kn0HR7gS3kkit/0Gf5iVGpQ8jFe7jhurDy9GDEKvCmnsNr0xOb3z9zuSnIA3erv8C/wVkFYEAHPKV7rw590fBp9QAOQXg= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzzlP7HegDyqgU8cvM+qxUSAQ/xdWzzAzKc5Jc8gS4myccvYMqQ 6Yr/FmhFedUcmXk9zXTAdTlr9Io3HZ3YBCU13ueY98IulNJThMnTcD3edXGOA26bxNMME6CskpI Y2o3h1j8v+EHaSfEeO9PJ23vxZZI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3416:b0:1a0:5841:6740 with SMTP id yn22-20020a056a21341600b001a058416740mr10131762pzb.14.1708298800689; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:26:40 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6be2558b8462fc08095c24c9257563ab5f3ae013.1708001398.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> In-Reply-To: From: Adam Ford Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 17:26:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PATCH v2] drm/imagination: DRM_POWERVR should depend on ARCH_K3 To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Biju Das , Geert Uytterhoeven , Frank Binns , Matt Coster , Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Sarah Walker , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Javier Martinez Canillas , Nishanth Menon , Marek Vasut , Linux-Renesas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 8:14=E2=80=AFAM Maxime Ripard = wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:13:14AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > Hi Maxime Ripard, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Maxime Ripard > > > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2024 9:05 AM > > > Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v2] drm/imagination: DRM_POWERVR should depen= d on > > > ARCH_K3 > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:47:46AM +0000, Biju Das wrote: > > > > Hi Adam Ford, > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Adam Ford > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 11:36 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/imagination: DRM_POWERVR should depen= d > > > > > on > > > > > ARCH_K3 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:22=E2=80=AFAM Adam Ford wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:10=E2=80=AFAM Adam Ford > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:54=E2=80=AFAM Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Maxime, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:18=E2=80=AFPM Maxime Ripard > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:50:09PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoe= ven > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Using the Imagination Technologies PowerVR Series 6 GPU > > > > > > > > > > requires a proprietary firmware image, which is current= ly > > > > > > > > > > only available for Texas Instruments K3 AM62x SoCs. He= nce > > > > > > > > > > add a dependency on ARCH_K3, to prevent asking the user > > > > > > > > > > about this driver when configuring a kernel without Tex= as > > > > > > > > > > Instruments K3 > > > > > Multicore SoC support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This wasn't making sense the first time you sent it, and = now > > > > > > > > > that commit log is just plain wrong. We have firmwares fo= r > > > > > > > > > the G6110, GX6250, GX6650, BXE-4-32, and BXS-4-64 models, > > > > > > > > > which can be found on (at least) Renesas, Mediatek, > > > > > > > > > Rockchip, TI and StarFive, so across three > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am so happy to be proven wrong! > > > > > > > > Yeah, GX6650 is found on e.g. R-Car H3, and GX6250 on e.g. > > > > > > > > R-Car M3- > > > > > W. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > architectures and 5 platforms. In two months. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That sounds like great progress, thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geert, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where can I find these firmwares? Linux-firmware[1] seems t= o > > > > > > > > lack all but the original K3 AM62x one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think PowerVR has a repo [1], but the last time I checked i= t, > > > > > > > the BVNC for the firmware didn't match what was necessary for > > > > > > > the GX6250 on the RZ/G2M. I can't remember what the > > > > > > > corresponding R-Car3 model is. I haven't tried recently beca= use > > > > > > > I was told more documentation for firmware porting would be > > > > > > > delayed until everything was pushed into the kernel and Mesa. > > > > > > > Maybe there is a better repo and/or newer firmware somewhere = else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I should have doubled checked the repo contents before I sent m= y > > > > > > last e-mail , but it appears the firmware [2] for the RZ/G2M, > > > > > > might be present now. I don't know if there are driver updates > > > > > > necessary. I checked my e-mails, but I didn't see any > > > > > > notification, or I would have tried it earlier. Either way, th= ank > > > > > > you Frank for adding it. I'll try to test when I have some tim= e. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't have the proper version of Mesa setup yet, but for what i= t's > > > > > worth, the firmware loads without error, and it doesn't hang. > > > > > > > > Based on [1] and [2], > > > > > > > > kmscube should work on R-Car as it works on RZ/G2L with panfrost as > > > > earlier version of RZ/G2L which uses drm based on RCar-Du, later ch= anged > > > to rzg2l-du. > > > > > > IIRC, the mesa support isn't there yet for kmscube to start. > > > > What about glmark2? I tested glmark2 as well. > > It's not really a matter of kmscube itself, but the interaction with the > compositor entirely. You can run a headless vulkan rendering, but an > application that renders to a window won't work. I have made a little progress. I have Ubuntu running on an RZ/G2M (Rogue GX6250) with a device tree configuring the GPU and the GPU loads with firmware. powervr fd000000.gpu: [drm] loaded firmware powervr/rogue_4.45.2.58_v1.fw powervr fd000000.gpu: [drm] FW version v1.0 (build 6513336 OS) [drm] Initialized powervr 1.0.0 20230904 for fd000000.gpu on minor 0 drmdevice lists card0 and renderD128 --- Checking the number of DRM device available --- --- Devices reported 2 --- --- Retrieving devices information (PCI device revision is ignored) --- device[0] +-> available_nodes 0x05 +-> nodes | +-> nodes[0] /dev/dri/card0 | +-> nodes[2] /dev/dri/renderD128 +-> bustype 0002 | +-> platform | +-> fullname /soc/gpu@fd000000 +-> deviceinfo +-> platform +-> compatible renesas,r8a774a1-gpu img,img-axe There is more to this dump, but it seems to repeat. I wanted to show that it seems like it's trying to work. I think I need to modify the powervr code in mesa to recognize the renesas,r8a774a1-gpu and associate it with the rcar-du, but I am not sure, and I am hoping someone might be able to provide some guidance, since I think I am missing something somewhere. I modified pvr_device.c in the mesa driver to attempt do this: /* This is the list of supported DRM render/display driver configs. */ static const struct pvr_drm_device_config pvr_drm_configs[] =3D { DEF_CONFIG("mediatek,mt8173-gpu", "mediatek-drm"), DEF_CONFIG("ti,am62-gpu", "ti,am625-dss"), DEF_CONFIG("renesas,r8a774a1-gpu", "rcar-du"), }; When I run modetest -M rcar-du, I can see the encoders and connectors and I can display test patterns, so the rcar-du is working. I built Mesa 24.0.1 with the following options: meson setup builddir -Dvulkan-drivers=3Dimagination-experimental -Dimagination-srv=3Dtrue -Dtools=3Dall -Dgallium-drivers=3Dzink,kmsro,swras= t I have tried to set PVR_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER=3D1 the Mesa documentation for the powerVR, and I have exported the variable for VK_ICD_FILENAMES to point to the powervr json file. when I try to run glmark2-drm, I was expecting the GL reddered to be the powervr, but it keeps using the GL_RENDERER: llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 128 bits) I realize this driver is still in its infancy, but I was hoping someone could give me some guidance to let me know if the work to do is on the Mesa side or the rcar-du driver side, or something else. I rebuilt both libdrm and mesa. While I don't get any errors, I also don't get the hardware acceleration I was hoping for. I even tried PVR_I_WANT_A_BROKEN_VULKAN_DRIVER=3D1 MESA_LOADER_DRIVER_OVERRIDE=3Dzink MESA_DEBUG=3Dcontect glmark2-drm ..but it only renders with llvmpipe glmark2 2023.01 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D OpenGL Information GL_VENDOR: Mesa GL_RENDERER: llvmpipe (LLVM 15.0.7, 128 bits) GL_VERSION: 4.5 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 24.0.1 Surface Config: buf=3D32 r=3D8 g=3D8 b=3D8 a=3D8 depth=3D32 stencil=3D0= samples=3D0 Surface Size: 3840x2160 fullscreen I am not as familiar with the Mesa side, but if I can get this working to a point where something is rendered, even if it's not 100% compliant, I'd like to push patches to the kernel and/or Mesa if necessary. adam > > Maxime