Received: by 2002:a05:7412:cfc7:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id by7csp1011140rdb; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:53:23 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWIBFiLYOqOLaLDMay3rgGbm6KzmjDi430trSKZcVXZ0IdwSAeIXqTtX9W3WYnp1RHTXDCKTY7NkqUgcwoqgl+zQTMt6mZ0fY11Q5qtYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGnHGCaL2eS1AvxZvk4o0CZFZkKWBBqB43LzN4tPwGWvGE4F21ohvtr93Nzl+uWrCr6VVjN X-Received: by 2002:a50:cddd:0:b0:564:3392:e9db with SMTP id h29-20020a50cddd000000b005643392e9dbmr3037599edj.33.1708332803030; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:53:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708332803; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZNiNuCuAdLcwz71OY9Vdg8i3jzpZOXFGpo+2e+ho2m3wQMtFlnRfOIETuZyQBWD/Wv Rpuk/Y24DFlW1M8+4I9m+4SGXaumqlYvcaWZT053ZWlaDf3yfX32jh2vcH9u4JT9aIWD g9X7nCxllaj17z8MOprQXeSlppGcyFTbEYcKJXz1NpEDGpbzLjMUvBBJx708zaxSBltJ 3ephLiAr2Nxs1OTrSh5FuULB6IufmU2qMgHtZid3069uDy2vDnL0sIMyFKRjZ41afryV DiztSJHamgN6rdMN1XSjkcqsrz8Ui660kNhcteIhFQqe1wLdxDw/h1XRSPwut0diOWZU o7CA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=KFjyMB85edu0Xy6r0SyHudy/SZ42PaKdfawATnHNXt4=; fh=PG6uS4TiiUSDyl8D/joYkWbwCgDm4ug0ir2h7tHBJXQ=; b=hjiXAKn+RyElMccxrLNZHimIPsHrM1+jmiSLAmZ27w5X4xaFQJ+IVSKAiQewizWRmu z5jgKtmEAi/yw28wUrMGR8VuFlN+tZ5ucKgVpxuqLXOyQDmXgzghGd+zkw0urRGefteV wvToaF2bQJIC1h+cuBzFHaWB6e6aSqqtewZUCpjGAjLwsD9TcgHHNRDMjxzSIjFvEeGB zfidv+ffAIpFKnf5ULEGK1l+xWZQ/gHn7Jv3RQl/zorRt8tkSHGQutJkYKTi6AGrqAKL UBN65cwwusptLQWS3QcqiLTzoza7dnRo04ZelFEuuJKfcNDJCQuF5/qFcX4ZHA33OCC3 412w==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=Es7HJyTC; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linutronix.de dkim=pass dkdomain=linutronix.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=linutronix.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-70972-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-70972-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j17-20020aa7c0d1000000b005643fc41f66si1400449edp.621.2024.02.19.00.53.22 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-70972-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=Es7HJyTC; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linutronix.de dkim=pass dkdomain=linutronix.de dmarc=pass fromdomain=linutronix.de); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-70972-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-70972-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6F01F210D7 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571DE22612; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Es7HJyTC"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="YBSRhCFm" Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D025210E1 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 08:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708332772; cv=none; b=PqwLuorq5IQTCkbnt6TGqP6q+aWuvsrQibXeuduSuK5XRXna3CgS0oosH9hMvJfU1WNkb4cMwo/wu1gYlMiXJd9vj9vKpN1IwUxAFbBYBSjQqjlmk8IREApVA7jTKkETcnlTFCaQRS3j7eV7TkSFgpnqLI6LPc4ey3g3eVYw4p0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708332772; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pg1FwB+kQ8F8kemtdVReXcqxP1+taKA0R1mQnwchW2I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=eonrMw+f1SE/TQfZvMHdG9vuOL9GXEARk5hVLzz1dQaqJd8eQWtOeT3qKtvsynUmlKOZ7Dcj/xuif3QlvRy/xlHR8Lui0By/2HBqOE7FLnrVVOS9t/4xWP3M+f9icXqBD7IqTyPCcZYnS8sPdIrBX7rSkMiYTfe++ILtp19N1f8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Es7HJyTC; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=YBSRhCFm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de From: Anna-Maria Behnsen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1708332768; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KFjyMB85edu0Xy6r0SyHudy/SZ42PaKdfawATnHNXt4=; b=Es7HJyTCMbQIMMnMjWZ6sPcSSCX80ODs8UkJF7VyzBo67eiKH/0+GqEVP/7u+qqYTxDwE5 E63hZW7Ptoac9ndgh1V3TALDNM9eGaVJXDT5oVB/EDKq/wf9n60RdyWPAH2GfYSbLHJeg3 le0lF0l9Lh2ti38oIjcXAftaxm/VsS86SuJ3T3QeQI2bnKjxC5WV0sKi7o9GqjymEYbJed tFFnAH378onwqBo+LxFxQxi1zL3GA48iUsElhratTCkvnJB5wttHlE+R7CLnpOD59LRFw7 6jllsNQsXL9kiZVPIR38dSJoXEhPK7sKkb2PdgdVJ7WOIzvSAcCNKlzRjGgC9A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1708332768; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KFjyMB85edu0Xy6r0SyHudy/SZ42PaKdfawATnHNXt4=; b=YBSRhCFmGpE/vVKUux8qmGb1zT9EgxuQYPx1GV1O5nGMdp9o41t96kWPBy7pschfW8TK3u ZEOgHsNr6T1imxCQ== To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra , John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Eric Dumazet , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Arjan van de Ven , "Paul E . McKenney" , Frederic Weisbecker , Rik van Riel , Steven Rostedt , Sebastian Siewior , Giovanni Gherdovich , Lukasz Luba , "Gautham R . Shenoy" , Srinivas Pandruvada , K Prateek Nayak , Anna-Maria Behnsen Subject: [PATCH v10a] timers: Move marking timer bases idle into tick_nohz_stop_tick() Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:52:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20240219085236.10624-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20240115143743.27827-4-anna-maria@linutronix.de> References: <20240115143743.27827-4-anna-maria@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The timer base is marked idle when get_next_timer_interrupt() is executed. But the decision whether the tick will be stopped and whether the system is able to go idle is done later. When the timer bases is marked idle and a new first timer is enqueued remote an IPI is raised. Even if it is not required because the tick is not stopped and the timer base is evaluated again at the next tick. To prevent this, the timer base is marked idle in tick_nohz_stop_tick() and get_next_timer_interrupt() is streamlined by only looking for the next timer interrupt. All other work is postponed to timer_base_try_to_set_idle() which is called by tick_nohz_stop_tick(). timer_base_try_to_set_idle() never resets timer_base::is_idle state. This is done when the tick is restarted via tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(). With this, tick_sched::tick_stopped and timer_base::is_idle are always in sync. So there is no longer the need to execute timer_clear_idle() in tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick(). This was required before, as tick_nohz_next_event() set timer_base::is_idle even if the tick would not be stopped. So timer_clear_idle() is only executed, when timer base is idle. So the check whether timer base is idle, is now no longer required as well. While at it fix some nearby whitespace damage as well. Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen --- v10a: - Drop the unnecessary if branch which handles return value of timer_base_try_to_set_idle() - Do not open code 'tick_nohz_retain_tick()' and keep tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick() as is. --- kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 1 + kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-------- kernel/time/timer.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h index 481b7ab65e2c..47df30b871e4 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h +++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static inline void timers_update_nohz(void) { } DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer_cpu_base, hrtimer_bases); extern u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem); +u64 timer_base_try_to_set_idle(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, bool *idle); void timer_clear_idle(void); #define CLOCK_SET_WALL \ diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 01fb50c1b17e..4c7ccb1c9307 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -849,11 +849,6 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu) */ delta = next_tick - basemono; if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) { - /* - * Tell the timer code that the base is not idle, i.e. undo - * the effect of get_next_timer_interrupt(): - */ - timer_clear_idle(); /* * We've not stopped the tick yet, and there's a timer in the * next period, so no point in stopping it either, bail. @@ -889,12 +884,34 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu) static void tick_nohz_stop_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu) { struct clock_event_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(tick_cpu_device.evtdev); + unsigned long basejiff = ts->last_jiffies; u64 basemono = ts->timer_expires_base; - u64 expires = ts->timer_expires; + bool timer_idle; + u64 expires; /* Make sure we won't be trying to stop it twice in a row. */ ts->timer_expires_base = 0; + /* + * Now the tick should be stopped definitely - so the timer base needs + * to be marked idle as well to not miss a newly queued timer. + */ + expires = timer_base_try_to_set_idle(basejiff, basemono, &timer_idle); + if (expires > ts->timer_expires) { + /* + * This path could only happen when the first timer was removed + * between calculating the possible sleep length and now (when + * high resolution mode is not active, timer could also be a + * hrtimer). + * + * We have to stick to the original calculated expiry value to + * not stop the tick for too long with a shallow C-state (which + * was programmed by cpuidle because of an early next expiration + * value). + */ + expires = ts->timer_expires; + } + /* * If this CPU is the one which updates jiffies, then give up * the assignment and let it be taken by the CPU which runs @@ -930,6 +947,10 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu) * scheduler tick in tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(). */ if (!ts->tick_stopped) { + /* If the timer base is not idle, retain the tick. */ + if (!timer_idle) + return; + calc_load_nohz_start(); quiet_vmstat(); @@ -991,7 +1012,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now) touch_softlockup_watchdog_sched(); /* Cancel the scheduled timer and restore the tick: */ - ts->tick_stopped = 0; + ts->tick_stopped = 0; tick_nohz_restart(ts, now); } @@ -1147,11 +1168,6 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(void) void tick_nohz_idle_retain_tick(void) { tick_nohz_retain_tick(this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched)); - /* - * Undo the effect of get_next_timer_interrupt() called from - * tick_nohz_next_event(). - */ - timer_clear_idle(); } /** diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c index 2aea55d53416..3a668060692e 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timer.c +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c @@ -1911,19 +1911,22 @@ static u64 cmp_next_hrtimer_event(u64 basem, u64 expires) return DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(nextevt, TICK_NSEC) * TICK_NSEC; } -static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem) +static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, + bool *idle) { struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]); unsigned long nextevt = basej + NEXT_TIMER_MAX_DELTA; u64 expires = KTIME_MAX; - bool was_idle; /* * Pretend that there is no timer pending if the cpu is offline. * Possible pending timers will be migrated later to an active cpu. */ - if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) + if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) { + if (idle) + *idle = true; return expires; + } raw_spin_lock(&base->lock); if (base->next_expiry_recalc) @@ -1953,17 +1956,26 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem) __forward_timer_base(base, basej); /* - * Base is idle if the next event is more than a tick away. - * - * If the base is marked idle then any timer add operation must forward - * the base clk itself to keep granularity small. This idle logic is - * only maintained for the BASE_STD base, deferrable timers may still - * see large granularity skew (by design). + * Set base->is_idle only when caller is timer_base_try_to_set_idle() */ - was_idle = base->is_idle; - base->is_idle = time_after(nextevt, basej + 1); - if (was_idle != base->is_idle) - trace_timer_base_idle(base->is_idle, base->cpu); + if (idle) { + /* + * Base is idle if the next event is more than a tick away. + * + * If the base is marked idle then any timer add operation must + * forward the base clk itself to keep granularity small. This + * idle logic is only maintained for the BASE_STD base, + * deferrable timers may still see large granularity skew (by + * design). + */ + if (!base->is_idle) { + if (time_after(nextevt, basej + 1)) { + base->is_idle = true; + trace_timer_base_idle(true, base->cpu); + } + } + *idle = base->is_idle; + } raw_spin_unlock(&base->lock); @@ -1980,7 +1992,21 @@ static inline u64 __get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem) */ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned long basej, u64 basem) { - return __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, basem); + return __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, basem, NULL); +} + +/** + * timer_base_try_to_set_idle() - Try to set the idle state of the timer bases + * @basej: base time jiffies + * @basem: base time clock monotonic + * @idle: pointer to store the value of timer_base->is_idle + * + * Returns the tick aligned clock monotonic time of the next pending + * timer or KTIME_MAX if no timer is pending. + */ +u64 timer_base_try_to_set_idle(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, bool *idle) +{ + return __get_next_timer_interrupt(basej, basem, idle); } /** @@ -1998,10 +2024,8 @@ void timer_clear_idle(void) * sending the IPI a few instructions smaller for the cost of taking * the lock in the exit from idle path. */ - if (base->is_idle) { - base->is_idle = false; - trace_timer_base_idle(false, smp_processor_id()); - } + base->is_idle = false; + trace_timer_base_idle(false, smp_processor_id()); } #endif -- 2.39.2