Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-71467-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, Alexandre
 Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>, Catalin Marinas
 <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Fabrice Gasnier
 <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: stm32-exti:
 Add irq nexus child node
In-Reply-To: <20240216094758.916722-3-antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
References: <20240216094758.916722-1-antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
 <20240216094758.916722-3-antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:19:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87cyssa64a.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Fri, Feb 16 2024 at 10:47, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> The mapping of EXTI interrupts to its parent interrupt controller
> is both SoC and instance dependent.
> The current implementation requires adding a new table to the
> driver's code and a new compatible for each new EXTI instance.
>
> Add to the binding an interrupt nexus child node that will be
> used on the new EXTI instances and can be optionally used on the
> existing instances.
> The property 'interrupt-map' in the nexus node maps each EXTI
> interrupt to the parent interrupt.
> Align #address-cells and #interrupt-cells between the EXTI node
> and its nexus node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>

This S-O-B chain is broken as it suggests that you wrote the patch and
Fabrice relayed it.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin

But that's not the case. If you co-developed this with Fabrice then
please use Co-developed-by. See:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by

Thanks,

        tglx