Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-71551-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: Set timeout to 100 seconds
Message-ID: <f7db39bd-d11e-4854-8b6e-2543aeec1d70@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:42 +0000
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
CC: <shuah@kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	<Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>,
	<jlayton@kernel.org>, <jack@suse.cz>
References: <20240209174243.74220-1-sj@kernel.org>
 <20240215011309.73168-1-sj@kernel.org> <202402161600.BF1D110BB@keescook>
From: "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <202402161600.BF1D110BB@keescook>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 17/02/2024 00:01, Kees Cook wrote:

> 
> Should it be 100 or 180? Either way:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> 
> --
> Kees Cook

Both options may work, I am more inclined to have this as 180 seconds by 
giving more time for the test to finish, this can be reduced later to 
100 or something else if we start hearing complains about the new timeout.

Hazem