Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-72107-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	wine-devel@winehq.org,
	=?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Almeida?= <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Arkadiusz Hiler <ahiler@codeweavers.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 29/31] selftests: ntsync: Add a stress test for contended waits.
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:38:31 -0600
Message-ID: <20240219223833.95710-30-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240219223833.95710-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
References: <20240219223833.95710-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Test a more realistic usage pattern, and one with heavy contention, in order to
actually exercise ntsync's internal synchronization.

This test has several threads in a tight loop acquiring a mutex, modifying some
shared data, and then releasing the mutex. At the end we check if the data is
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index 968874d7e325..5fa2c9a0768c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -1330,4 +1330,78 @@ TEST(alert_all)
 	close(fd);
 }
 
+#define STRESS_LOOPS 10000
+#define STRESS_THREADS 4
+
+static unsigned int stress_counter;
+static int stress_device, stress_start_event, stress_mutex;
+
+static void *stress_thread(void *arg)
+{
+	struct ntsync_wait_args wait_args = {0};
+	__u32 index, count, i;
+	int ret;
+
+	wait_args.timeout = UINT64_MAX;
+	wait_args.count = 1;
+	wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)&stress_start_event;
+	wait_args.owner = gettid();
+	wait_args.index = 0xdeadbeef;
+
+	ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, &wait_args);
+
+	wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)&stress_mutex;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < STRESS_LOOPS; ++i) {
+		ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ANY, &wait_args);
+
+		++stress_counter;
+
+		unlock_mutex(stress_mutex, wait_args.owner, &count);
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+TEST(stress_wait)
+{
+	struct ntsync_event_args event_args;
+	struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args;
+	pthread_t threads[STRESS_THREADS];
+	__u32 signaled, i;
+	int ret;
+
+	stress_device = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY);
+	ASSERT_LE(0, stress_device);
+
+	mutex_args.owner = 0;
+	mutex_args.count = 0;
+	ret = ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	stress_mutex = mutex_args.mutex;
+
+	event_args.manual = 1;
+	event_args.signaled = 0;
+	ret = ioctl(stress_device, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT, &event_args);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	stress_start_event = event_args.event;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < STRESS_THREADS; ++i)
+		pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, stress_thread, NULL);
+
+	ret = ioctl(stress_start_event, NTSYNC_IOC_EVENT_SET, &signaled);
+	EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < STRESS_THREADS; ++i) {
+		ret = pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
+		EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+	}
+
+	EXPECT_EQ(STRESS_LOOPS * STRESS_THREADS, stress_counter);
+
+	close(stress_start_event);
+	close(stress_mutex);
+	close(stress_device);
+}
+
 TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
-- 
2.43.0