Received: by 2002:a05:7412:cfc7:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id by7csp1670293rdb; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCVT0zuSKyZHBlrn23j2eGMaJCmpvTDUO0q+uFGc8CytpuBZB/twPPlshQMqWAjsAV+ty9NJy+/GKrNbxm8i4D+vG8+S/3zxneEYYACx6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHFsouKAKESQddNDaEw5joBtlEukw1Om8WFV+LjurrpyCMJzv8FdZyADO1t08mqqAE+OaCK X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:16c6:b0:6e4:30f1:3f25 with SMTP id l6-20020a05683016c600b006e430f13f25mr14188613otr.7.1708429018207; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708429018; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VVzktiyMPZDGZdsQsakgLavrI8sNzyH2HBemafAbuckZ9x1aM4T1FlXDISVTUvUZYC fTcFlxAdR5YXIX+0Q+Idr8eZsy3eUqW5bn6JrH+pXpTSmvvbO9LhDoa5560R+CArwYb4 cFqc3ZYwqStyKmnTFrR65K+rMQxH2nlIFOkDSuGxTQo6WeZzhPCFru4DLdhUVgueW6MJ +GBziK6d7oJmcpSjJsBoiUuLYBOW1V5Wu+RnoIy+YoBagsvlwn/2GCUKk3WnIlIVZEuE e8QvF8mxr9cku6DI7EfljzaOgT2qzbJYw56saEZ/fkRxkdaqyDuzamp/2JzoujAEs1WF JX3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=Cz1c5ISGmBdsxneLIlZx/BdFlZMirzknWzhxQibv2VY=; fh=o8qbs+v8PQXZY7Rz5Tt44JiJmivRr7M1OVX0XPMkEng=; b=Xs1+dkQOtrWd4/eeIs9aoIbrOmKouKWRf8W29538oEnEnGAdE0dEOpIz7Pqm9hCvoM kYGzwJN2TJitAlFYZWICKXd3pvCUCm6Wz0gXlLBFc2mOQSNU1MWQxbCr48QPL2X5cE6m ibjex+ORwKbF+tUYZmm3KMSHsJ/OsOWOAulUzzMJd0iHYt8HvpBretWfRow5wwF83yUv yVzk2o+d4T/TqUpFAYI8Lhd4Z93D+yE42MdfT35TDr04dTRJVBUVrgqUlfFqcLm4DBIa 2WpugA3uicPpWximHHpupydA3dnMKdz+Du8n+BlJtQP3j+qqvBnYOwAGt/CpNNBDh5aN W5Ww==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.s=default header.b=myYCSnem; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.alibaba.com dkim=pass dkdomain=linux.alibaba.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.alibaba.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-72917-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-72917-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w186-20020a6382c3000000b005d760d1af1csi6041451pgd.460.2024.02.20.03.36.57 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Feb 2024 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-72917-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.s=default header.b=myYCSnem; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.alibaba.com dkim=pass dkdomain=linux.alibaba.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.alibaba.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-72917-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-72917-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FE028163A for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E40267A0C; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="myYCSnem" Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9840766B4F for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:36:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708429011; cv=none; b=iMtGVbltpwwLZQz29p/B9yeRF0Heik7AU1Fsz2lmGF2ZTDqOZz0911/pY3eEFkQI6mzxE9Q5qQSjEhciFcZe3mZcym7baDCv0zLIfN0MoGo2qHtCh4RgiApvDRjfJdNGNypUONkViVAmd2WtoIai/qQ0NRIEkiO3gOTHQ+f99QQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708429011; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MJZTwvMAhXU1TEesSE5qck+Xlaoz9q2+OP1AZ3mvBy8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=YQLo1efzBPoYgwxus4jQJ9Akzx5XF78xPBALdG2Sm5IxiRASGSBwygRmpd3uOTqBKn2j4NjF0F0pTJCOWntlikKYTiReZytivRvZn3Rvo3cRiR3ICNbE9H6bjm5dZKlpeBeEY+c+z4tIeYg9+nfI31UInkTT0juCgcXYSAQ09rs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=myYCSnem; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1708429001; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=Cz1c5ISGmBdsxneLIlZx/BdFlZMirzknWzhxQibv2VY=; b=myYCSnem7v/BWmz0M7MvyuyhBIg4zODOaDg1YCDFptmor0rA7rPntF3nyD0WEKBXpCheZTtn9Gw9A+o/C4NkIpZKybcCkeYzAbJm5iegT0jzjpraD6P8ucGHbPpWQzi6zJr8klx57DPRwxA2FbMRTZlP6Cn96r1UNGHHpmMt4js= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R701e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046050;MF=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=11;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W0wabbT_1708428963; Received: from localhost.localdomain(mailfrom:rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W0wabbT_1708428963) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:36:40 +0800 From: Rongwei Wang To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, pierre.gondois@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, teng.ma@linux.alibaba.com Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] support NUMA emulation for genertic arch Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:36:00 +0800 Message-Id: <20240220113602.6943-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.0 In-Reply-To: <20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit A brief introduction ==================== The NUMA emulation can fake more node base on a single node system, e.g. one node system: [root@localhost ~]# numactl -H available: 1 nodes (0) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 0 size: 31788 MB node 0 free: 31446 MB node distances: node 0 0: 10 add numa=fake=2 (fake 2 node on each origin node): [root@localhost ~]# numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 0 size: 15806 MB node 0 free: 15451 MB node 1 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 1 size: 16029 MB node 1 free: 15989 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 10 1: 10 10 As above shown, a new node has been faked. As cpus, the realization of x86 NUMA emulation is kept. Maybe each node should has 4 cores is better (not sure, next to do if so). Why do this =========== It seems has following reasons: (1) In x86 host, apply NUMA emulation can fake more nodes environment to test or verify some performance stuff, but arm64 only has one method that modify ACPI table to do this. It's troublesome more or less. (2) Reduce competition for some locks. Here an example we found: will-it-scale/tlb_flush1_processes -t 96 -s 10, it shows obvious hotspot on lruvec->lock when test in single environment. What's more, The performance improved greatly if test in two more nodes system. The data shows below (more is better): --------------------------------------------------------------------- threads/process | 1 | 12 | 24 | 48 | 96 --------------------------------------------------------------------- one node | 14 1122 | 110 5372 | 111 2615 | 79 7084 | 72 4516 --------------------------------------------------------------------- numa=fake=2 | 14 1168 | 144 4848 | 215 9070 | 157 0412 | 142 3968 --------------------------------------------------------------------- | For concurrency 12, no lruvec->lock hotspot. For 24, hotspot | one node has 24% hotspot on lruvec->lock, but | two nodes env hasn't. --------------------------------------------------------------------- As for risks (e.g. numa balance...), they need to be discussed here. Lastly, it seems not a good choice to realize x86 and other genertic archs separately. But it can indeed avoid some architecture related APIs adjustments and alleviate future maintenance. The previous RFC link see [1]. Any advice are welcome, Thanks! Change log ========== RFC v1 -> v1 * add new CONFIG_NUMA_FAKE for genertic archs. * keep x86 implementation, realize numa emulation in driver/base/ for genertic arch, e.g, arm64. [1] RFC v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/cover/20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com/ Rongwei Wang (2): arch_numa: remove __init for early_cpu_to_node numa: introduce numa emulation for genertic arch drivers/base/Kconfig | 9 + drivers/base/Makefile | 1 + drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 32 +- drivers/base/numa_emulation.c | 909 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/base/numa_emulation.h | 41 ++ include/asm-generic/numa.h | 2 +- 6 files changed, 992 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.c create mode 100644 drivers/base/numa_emulation.h -- 2.32.0.3.gf3a3e56d6