Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-73573-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:10:37 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Alex Soo <yuklin.soo@starfivetech.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
	Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>,
	Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>,
	Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@starfivetech.com>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: starfive: Add JH8100
 pinctrl
Message-ID: <20240220-bottling-reverence-e0ee08f48ccc@spud>
References: <20240220064246.467216-1-yuklin.soo@starfivetech.com>
 <20240220064246.467216-2-yuklin.soo@starfivetech.com>
 <1a11cee2-2ef1-4ce0-8cc1-63c6cc97863f@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tADB2NrbVw9jbyhp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1a11cee2-2ef1-4ce0-8cc1-63c6cc97863f@linaro.org>


--tADB2NrbVw9jbyhp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/02/2024 07:42, Alex Soo wrote:
> > Add documentation and header file for JH8100 pinctrl driver.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Soo <yuklin.soo@starfivetech.com>
> > ---
>=20
>=20
> RFC? Why isn't this patch ready for review?

The TL;DR is that Emil and I didn't want to apply the dts patches to
support a platform that hadn't actually been taped out yet.=20
For an SoC in that state, at least the bindings for, clock and pinctrl
could be subject to changes before tapeou. I think putting RFC on those
patches is a good idea, but of course the rationale should be mentioned.

Cheers,
Conor.

--tADB2NrbVw9jbyhp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZdT5LQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0q4/AP9aepRkgGMwUZFmvYfa5PLBEmZ95b0tJEUr42AOOQptlQEAvcfTGWd32hy5
EqoPPciZYk30PuQQ68mEvIHOaYAqnwE=
=gvQL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tADB2NrbVw9jbyhp--