Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-73849-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:04:34 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: kovalev@altlinux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, laforge@gnumonks.org,
 davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, nickel@altlinux.org,
 oficerovas@altlinux.org, dutyrok@altlinux.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ver.2] gtp: fix use-after-free and null-ptr-deref in
 gtp_genl_dump_pdp()
Message-ID: <20240220160434.29bcaf43@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Zc5NP/5Eyh8bsbH6@calendula>
References: <20240214162733.34214-1-kovalev@altlinux.org>
	<ZczvJKETNyFE5Glm@calendula>
	<a4463193-fd73-eca3-616b-d75176d947c6@basealt.ru>
	<Zcz0tG9XMqLHMKs+@calendula>
	<1044d472-c733-3901-9df9-41a29b2c9fb4@basealt.ru>
	<Zc5NP/5Eyh8bsbH6@calendula>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:43:46 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Yes, I can prepare several patches with the same commit message. Is it
> > better to send them individually (like this patch) or in a series with a
> > brief preliminary description (PATCH 0/x)?  
> 
> I'd suggest one patch for each subsystem as per MAINTAINER file, that
> should also make it easier for Linux kernel -stable maintainers to
> pick up this fix series.

Pablo is anything expected to change from gtp patch itself?
Someone (DaveM?) marked this as Changes Requested but I don't see 
a clear ask, other that to follow up with patches to other families.