Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-74145-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:21:17 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jani Nikula
 <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Oded Gabbay
 <ogabbay@kernel.org>, Thomas =?UTF-8?B?SGVsbHN0csO2bQ==?=
 <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, "Maarten Lankhorst"
 <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
 Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, "Matthew Brost"
 <matthew.brost@intel.com>, Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>, "Daniele
 Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
 <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/xe: skip building debugfs code for
 CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n
Message-ID: <20240221172117.243799cf@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <ngu6vq5izal6suyr57p4vlxnrn4kxyii4ewdktxvw7k3uezlcz@6oevav3wpcjh>
References: <20240213134817.3347574-1-arnd@kernel.org>
	<877cj88lck.fsf@intel.com>
	<17209419-093b-4674-8b43-06c92312ef61@app.fastmail.com>
	<ngu6vq5izal6suyr57p4vlxnrn4kxyii4ewdktxvw7k3uezlcz@6oevav3wpcjh>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/F5A94gSepNQOsNsZBCFEmzQ";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256

--Sig_/F5A94gSepNQOsNsZBCFEmzQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Lucas,

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:29:54 -0600 Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.co=
m> wrote:
>=20
> Looking at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-nex=
t.git/commit/?id=3D2d5c7b7eb345249cb34d42cbc2b97b4c57ea944e
> it seems we still don't have drm-xe-next branch in linux-next.
>=20
> Stephen, could you please add it? Or do I have to do something on my end
> before that?  This is the branch:
>=20
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel drm-xe-next

Added from tomorrow.  Currently the only contact is yourself.  Do you
want anyone else (or a mailing list) as well?

Do you want the drm-xe-fixes branch included as well?

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window.=20

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and=20
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell=20
sfr@canb.auug.org.au

--Sig_/F5A94gSepNQOsNsZBCFEmzQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmXVll0ACgkQAVBC80lX
0GwELQf/Q/n3K4HqKLq39MDQhZAAJUBm1YxvwNnirZMlCmqiK66yOw8Mt0c3ThO4
c61KtjDLov3dlY8sJ5Ho+E4j2z4Q62GPf+dIwwFaSTrNDg57qhBfo9J00ioJur2n
jzIF+kR38PSXCvIsblWTjV7GpGgp6fTLhULvVXnxs9Dc20NomGmaEtiyiN5M4kt0
tMYge3qsrS4d2CPy3wkDlSCWjrc4paWLwmTmZ2Uf+PlyAdgPtIzlvAz2uAGr6hFQ
oIN+q++HxtJExWkQuFhZU2QwjAVRHJXYblDtQdu5ePuj2wckNnRTWHX8ldHkNdSF
/BsXRvfeQCBnd1jkkTz0zyprAVdF0Q==
=K4kr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/F5A94gSepNQOsNsZBCFEmzQ--