Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-74794-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 05:26:15 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com>,
	Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ma=EDra?= Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@gmail.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthur.grillo@usp.br>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] net: test: Fix printf format specifier in
 skb_segment kunit test
Message-ID: <1a85d2bf-e38c-4fa7-bfbe-c80148b50317@roeck-us.net>
References: <20240221092728.1281499-1-davidgow@google.com>
 <20240221092728.1281499-7-davidgow@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240221092728.1281499-7-davidgow@google.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:19PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> KUNIT_FAIL() accepts a printf-style format string, but previously did
> not let gcc validate it with the __printf() attribute. The use of %lld
> for the result of PTR_ERR() is not correct.
> 
> Instead, use %pe and pass the actual error pointer. printk() will format
> it correctly (and give a symbolic name rather than a number if
> available, which should make the output more readable, too).
> 
> Fixes: b3098d32ed6e ("net: add skb_segment kunit test")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>  net/core/gso_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/gso_test.c b/net/core/gso_test.c
> index 4c2e77bd12f4..358c44680d91 100644
> --- a/net/core/gso_test.c
> +++ b/net/core/gso_test.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void gso_test_func(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  	segs = skb_segment(skb, features);
>  	if (IS_ERR(segs)) {
> -		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "segs error %lld", PTR_ERR(segs));
> +		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "segs error %pe", segs);
>  		goto free_gso_skb;
>  	} else if (!segs) {
>  		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "no segments");
> -- 
> 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
>