Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756832AbXL3Ork (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:47:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753125AbXL3Ord (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:47:33 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:50603 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752183AbXL3Orc (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:47:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:47:08 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Garzik , Manfred Spraul , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: seperate handler for msix and normal int. Message-ID: <20071230144708.GQ16946@elte.hu> References: <200712291415.47835.yinghai.lu@sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712291415.47835.yinghai.lu@sun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -0.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-0.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -0.5 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.1127] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 20 * Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH] forcedeth: seperate handler for msix and normal int. > > so we don't need to keep checking np->msi_flags to see if > NV_MSI_X_ENABLED is set in handler hm, why is this patch needed and what's the effect of this patch? i'm also wondering, what happened to Jeff's very nice flow cleanups and simplifications to forcedeth.c. They are not in 2.6.24 - are they queued up for 2.6.25 perhaps? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/