Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-74946-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:54:39 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Add SMB2360 pmic dtsi
Message-ID: <ZdYOr6/8dupbMdbF@linaro.org>
References: <20240221-x1e80100-dts-smb2360-v2-0-037d183cc021@linaro.org>
 <20240221-x1e80100-dts-smb2360-v2-2-037d183cc021@linaro.org>
 <bc45229c-6412-4fd5-ba8e-28b293d7864b@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bc45229c-6412-4fd5-ba8e-28b293d7864b@linaro.org>

On 24-02-21 15:41:41, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 21.02.2024 15:38, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Add nodes for SMB2360 with the eUSB2 repeater nodes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8d7bdb56e6fe
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/smb2360.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Limited
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > +};
> > +
> > +&spmi_bus1 {
> > +	smb2360h: pmic@7 {
> 
> Hm, I'm not 100% sure about bringing in this letter-suffix notation..
> 
> But then, is there anything better? What are they called in schematics?
> SMB2360_n, perhaps?


Yeah, just realized that this is wrong. I need to do something like
sc8280xp-pmics.dtsi.

There are different sources of information for the suffix, some of them 
use smb2360k, some of them use smb2360_0. Will go with the second.

> 
> konrad