Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-74969-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240219230116.77b8ad68@yea> <ZdRtDOhQGQUm5X4d@archie.me>
 <20240220134556.61f6441c@yea> <ae1ffd81-5026-4d64-b055-4f60090962a5@amd.com>
 <20240220184323.2c8b4f0a@yea> <3c5b80a7-5bf9-4752-a596-438924fdec9c@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c5b80a7-5bf9-4752-a596-438924fdec9c@amd.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:09:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CADnq5_NUuZ_cfLxsS-ZBFh9b1DDNi-oNuuQuMz8Px7LtT_g6_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Running ttm_device_test leads to list_add corruption. prev->next
 should be next (ffffffffc05cd428), but was 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b.
 (prev=ffffa0b1a5c034f0) (kernel 6.7.5)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>, 
	Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, 
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, 
	Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek@intel.com>, 
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, 
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 9:13=E2=80=AFAM Christian K=C3=B6nig
<christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
>
> Am 20.02.24 um 18:43 schrieb Erhard Furtner:
> > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:50:04 +0100
> > Christian K=C3=B6nig <christian.koenig@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah and that's probably the problem. The test is not supposed to be
> >> compiled and executed on bare metal, but rather just as unit test
> >> through user mode Linux.
> >>
> >> We probably don't check that correctly in the kconfig for some reason.
> >> Can you provide your .config file?
> >>
> > Here's my v6.8-rc5 .config attached.
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> As long as nobody comes up with an approach how to run the test even
> when other drivers want to interact with TTM the attached patch is my
> best idea.
>
> It basically disabled compiling the TTM tests as long as neither
> compiling for UML or COMPILE_TEST are set.
>
> Opinions?

Makes sense to me.

Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Erhard