Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75077-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:08:40 +0100
Message-Id: <CZAVY4NPY4H6.1KJI4UPRUM21C@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mobileye,eyeq5-pinctrl:
 add bindings
Cc: "Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>, "Michael Turquette"
 <mturquette@baylibre.com>, "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>, "Rob Herring"
 <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
 "Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
 =?utf-8?q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= <rafal@milecki.pl>, "Philipp Zabel"
 <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, "Vladimir Kondratiev"
 <vladimir.kondratiev@mobileye.com>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
 <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
 <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, "Rob Herring"
 <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
From: =?utf-8?q?Th=C3=A9o_Lebrun?= <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
References: <20240212-mbly-clk-v6-0-c46fa1f93839@bootlin.com>
 <20240212-mbly-clk-v6-5-c46fa1f93839@bootlin.com>
 <CACRpkdYNe=2w10uB1mUgs2Lgg1TRiSF=bOa45OH5Lcz6+G6FEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYNe=2w10uB1mUgs2Lgg1TRiSF=bOa45OH5Lcz6+G6FEg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Wed Feb 21, 2024 at 2:38 PM CET, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:44=E2=80=AFPM Th=C3=A9o Lebrun <theo.lebrun@boo=
tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Add dt-schema type bindings for the Mobileye EyeQ5 pin controller.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Th=C3=A9o Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>
> I tried to just apply the pin control patches to the pin control tree, bu=
t I
> can't because of all collisions in MAINTAINERS.
>
> If you move all MAINTAINERS business to the SoC-wide patch I can
> apply the pin control stuff directly, but maybe you wanna keep the
> series together and merge on an all-or-nothing basis?

I'm all in for making the series slimmer over time. MAINTAINERS changes
will be moved.

Thanks,

--
Th=C3=A9o Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------