Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75164-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ankur Arora
 <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
 akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
 dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
 juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, willy@infradead.org,
 mgorman@suse.de, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
 andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, bristot@kernel.org,
 mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
 glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com,
 mattst88@gmail.com, krypton@ulrich-teichert.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
 David.Laight@aculab.com, richard@nod.at, mjguzik@gmail.com,
 jon.grimm@amd.com, bharata@amd.com, raghavendra.kt@amd.com,
 boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, Arnd Bergmann
 <arnd@arndb.de>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/30] thread_info: tif_need_resched() now takes
 resched_t as param
In-Reply-To: <877ciykc9v.fsf@oracle.com>
References: <20240213055554.1802415-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
 <20240213055554.1802415-4-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
 <ZczJU8uZdbRKvcAE@FVFF77S0Q05N> <87v86k8opr.ffs@tglx>
 <877ciykc9v.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:07:49 +0100
Message-ID: <875xyhhhju.ffs@tglx>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Tue, Feb 20 2024 at 14:21, Ankur Arora wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>>> static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched_lazy(void)
>>> {
>>> 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO) &&
>>> 	        __tif_need_resched(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY);
>>> }
>>
>> Yes please.
>
> As I wrote to Mark in the sibling subthread, I think exposing
> the lazy variants outside of the scheduler isn't really needed.

But having a proper wrapper inline in the scheduler code (local header)
makes still a lot of sense.

Thanks,

        tglx