Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75221-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:44:38 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	corbet@lwn.net, paulmck@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, yanjiewtw@gmail.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ke.wang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Control the frequency of intensive warning
 through cmdline
Message-ID: <ZdY2htJ5D0FisH1M@slm.duckdns.org>
References: <20240219074634.2039-1-xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
 <ZdTXWrB8dascOIM_@slm.duckdns.org>
 <CAB8ipk9R3hRSTTEEBn8nvOcTZGBtaDQfomXiQwji+DTKgLghwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZdWNvolkfPCyMNj9@slm.duckdns.org>
 <CAB8ipk9FtgYh5Ho-nFQCwUO8zOPEk73VS0KHFDuRS9yxDRpe4A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAB8ipk9FtgYh5Ho-nFQCwUO8zOPEk73VS0KHFDuRS9yxDRpe4A@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 07:00:55PM +0800, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> This way looks simpler, but it could not disable the warnings, but I

Yeah, I meant that it'd make sense if the value 0 disables the warning.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun