Received: by 2002:a05:7412:cfc7:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id by7csp2606425rdb; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:07:51 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUVAHMZycrn4wYq8C31eQNQ+KhhtM1vizklTQcLQ8bsjWKGAzq4JHSJbwljqFePLqKRTvR2j1AiSkvy/Rz+Zx+j6zqIO8sVMECjm5ElqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEFmgxkzY2ZeOMdE93veyifQH7nlQczDRhLONhJN9RDPDecWlNTJypjJEkS5A+GIsUqiiuX X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:76e6:b0:a3e:c817:f28e with SMTP id kg6-20020a17090776e600b00a3ec817f28emr5562255ejc.61.1708549670890; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:07:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qk36-20020a1709077fa400b00a3e7028c6dcsi3670016ejc.837.2024.02.21.13.07.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75496-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="dk8Mxis/"; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75496-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-75496-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E6D1F2127C for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9A5126F14; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dk8Mxis/" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7B983CD8 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708549664; cv=none; b=HXjtDpMX6VM9MeZ50LG2uO4ChYGvv63aDOScTXm6OwySUnMoEs5ogik+qWQbkNSyjm39zY7dwyo7qBS+JoxEHWzSLKHhg29dsJnx6FhIvPylYW/C2wXyvTOCCO4pmkPDJJyrUvvf8j/7NaLZ8LsWS/ZCSnpJUfvGYQbswgI9qjE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708549664; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nA1youg90/ZP2DIb11j9lh81YY3aAWIu00fTWWD2H/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cVfSidIoxQvLOixjpmyvBUj5QTTFewSdizqEveZR3KBKMw/7+mOeAr4bTwsdrmuYAFvpJniEwwcTSLH6hLXiMcsVRJNWbnbWqZlojHEO3VkOrL3mSfuDGx80zYwiZ4VWKJkCvzVEAoKXTx90Trz3b362XOcfEKGQwv257Ep6qk0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dk8Mxis/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708549663; x=1740085663; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=nA1youg90/ZP2DIb11j9lh81YY3aAWIu00fTWWD2H/U=; b=dk8Mxis/i3cG6raRd/dzrrVPbTBo+BUHKv6U8F6eKMnvPOYwJ8Qs6Swl 1HFwdTNbysGmvMU/8CiGDc7J+vK0xbBNRG8iUNBVCErTCkeggfwTenlq7 xaibkoRHfO4VpYudt2UE6IBSygFuVfrZrnnHLS0b21h3mi8X9NTjya0gt ETZ3zOFGrjNbm2MAED1xS3yeyIZ8uoB/UXyTA0odlYV/sDailBOU7W1nU CBEYOKfSmf2bKgQgsRLMkCFMSpz0GKRpbymwoWotRyD64W4el9dSs8+Su JtrFJFPzhOLZoP0MiWsSEsCMVPDlAE0BZE0iyrcemnbEOJafyVb7dFQcb g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10991"; a="13297218" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,176,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="13297218" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2024 13:07:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10991"; a="913373115" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,176,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913373115" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2024 13:07:40 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rctoX-00000006TCs-16Ap; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 23:07:37 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 23:07:36 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Lucas De Marchi , Yury Norov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula , intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks Message-ID: References: <20240208074521.577076-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> <20240208074521.577076-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:06:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 22:30, Dmitry Baryshkov > > wrote: .. > > Excuse me, it seems a c&p from gitlab didn't work as expected. > > No problem, it's clear that the patch has not been properly tested and > obviously wrong. Has to be dropped. If somebody wants that, it will > be material for v6.10 cycle. ..which makes me think that bitmap(bitops) lack of assembly test case(s). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko