Received: by 2002:a05:7412:798b:b0:fc:a2b0:25d7 with SMTP id fb11csp97126rdb; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:05:34 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCXkPrnjDUm4p/ZSrnqYFOJQ6bu19d08L8p71FqSnTa11uDkljVk80ADQTlFluvy/UxVaew0I3lU2BW9CSmImglLX6RpBOrlxiSyseZqFg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFmHy5G5GKtzv7EWtp3WKvyyPBeryN3z3wzWN3jpDP99Z9biGgDOE+v7qpWl0BFml0Ha9iw X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:28e:b0:1db:e837:4091 with SMTP id j14-20020a170903028e00b001dbe8374091mr11414415plr.3.1708571133740; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:05:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8-20020a170902cec800b001d6f295bc53si9398344plg.204.2024.02.21.19.05.33 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75828-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=scZRBduR; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-75828-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-75828-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB882848BB for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 03:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925B12BAFF; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 03:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="scZRBduR" Received: from mail-oi1-f180.google.com (mail-oi1-f180.google.com [209.85.167.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F02F224FB for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 03:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708570970; cv=none; b=UBbf5h4XFWP1hN7wwfRhjewNmq14frXhrt3d+s0gHSrfgrKctJ+gm06taN6J5c7fR/qDYhMMWMqsOqXEE6P7yMAhU3ADaTA2X/L/beFOby858mpV57VGYo7g11QeInhIuEXPSOMME2MXClMW9I8L4ITJKhr/Nr9THmoWgYKrRZU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708570970; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r6h1NTeFTkbjAGya8zua/jcWtSX1k++dA2oUrhCyAv0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=nxAuGItieNr0nwbCPPGJVO41DNNZKjSPjFSIkkl4zLk5CrwR6T7iacHlyjhH+sf+9A2PG8wvf/wUwrErnnKaUE4EQCkMMkSC2w+1zfLk5+rJLaXJ5JT8WKHs45R0eU3VufuuYfqYTBFVrZpagQiQA39k6ajOxjVT8y04m184BtU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=scZRBduR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Received: by mail-oi1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3c1652613d3so1912358b6e.1 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:02:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1708570967; x=1709175767; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7FVV9XkzNkckGF5r8p15gninEMa0F9j2UMwTU7X9t5U=; b=scZRBduRa515C5gQ60zOEJASctFC4+FOyPMXT6OFTaWZQO0PNNlZIiFTHlD3b5spHU o3uMSi7tWHsEhcUkWauWZXFGdI0F8Ef0g/X7VgrcM2789owNsubqrHKmH23xTDXYAGjv T+Tl8+5oCOuXizo752X8sSyWGggGClU3LZyQ4+tsdZyLo8cX4DWurdvtNQ5Cr8TM7OOS ph9b6zCZGRBylEhfYCp+I3ObpQGSwKNjYMle6jiM4Z0ISzKv722DHtzDLc/moZitLJ/S P8RhQYG2BIlJp/EHA0j5AofZuUqbxhae+ohNzi2D2yYZKBd/avhcB3GV9i0Ko7gspTQo a4uA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708570967; x=1709175767; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7FVV9XkzNkckGF5r8p15gninEMa0F9j2UMwTU7X9t5U=; b=it/avuRlxYmzcYeP3VOf1TGafcSBLG1TGWRqsy03Eb0wNT5ZZ3DNLs/ceGsJMVLRlc njuzq+kSXJlA9ClTGuwKQOeJ8FB3pWmscXtLz5RaJzU3E0QfKGEy7c4ET3Wb1UaF/qk+ zufPfRgcnAs53LciI3xbEFu8keUVEdlew0k+UjRGp/ShpGUYnDe8h/hQj3ZwbsedCc/f 7CKlK05iymYTjA8CP/UoqErFeXlsyl7McW8WASgClLN6nEUGXV3KYK0MvXaMnhxT0QuJ I5014M95GJa74S1HCEkqveheRQkq+SlbreuehKMshQQMB/YzZdrfFYIHOMQpAn11JopD 3R8Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU7Sr3y+QKFj9ZDrIlYMbPZ/ySeKpWrCTuG9syWhozGGs42N7I5cn7paDsgIO+APe2r40yXNw4e3K+41Z0Uwq3KwW/fNb3lBjthWUrT X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwIrC3SyokbePDcYnSEE3HX1RjhYFZ2b/iHqTK/BcNeurbnXR6Y LrTUDysOlI1RoU2iGtPZqr4+Q2ByU1GqgIXynJAJIzBfLb6Wox+RZpgfX8ovG6U= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1249:b0:3c1:7c2b:8d51 with SMTP id o9-20020a056808124900b003c17c2b8d51mr229612oiv.54.1708570967058; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([136.62.192.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l26-20020aca191a000000b003c16b1d3862sm640909oii.50.2024.02.21.19.02.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:02:46 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Protsenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi Cc: Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , Tomasz Figa , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 13/15] clk: samsung: Implement manual PLL control for ARM64 SoCs Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:02:33 -0600 Message-Id: <20240222030235.27815-14-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240222030235.27815-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> References: <20240222030235.27815-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Some ARM64 Exynos chips are capable to control PLL clocks automatically. For those chips, whether the PLL is controlled automatically or manually is chosen in PLL_CON1 register with next bits: [28] ENABLE_AUTOMATIC_CLKGATING [1] MANUAL_PLL_CTRL [0] AUTO_PLL_CTRL The bl2 bootloader sets 0x10000001 value for some PLL_CON1 registers, which means any attempt to control those PLLs manually (e.g. disabling/enabling those PLLs or changing MUX parent clocks) would lead to PLL lock timeout with error message like this: Could not lock PLL ... At the moment, all Samsung clock drivers implement manual clock control. So in order to make it possible to control PLLs, corresponding PLL_CON1 registers should be set to 0x2 first. Some older ARM64 chips don't implement the automatic clock control though. It also might be desirable to configure some PLLs for manual control, while keeping the default configuration for the rest. So it'd convenient to choose this PLL mode for each CMU separately. Introduce manual_plls field to CMU structure to choose the PLL control mode. Because it'll be initialized with "false" in all existing CMU structures by default, it won't affect any existing clock drivers, allowing for this feature to be enabled gradually when it's needed with no change for the rest of users. In case .manual_plls is set, set PLL_CON1 registers to manual control, akin to what's already done for gate clocks in exynos_arm64_init_clocks(). Of course, PLL_CON1 registers should be added to corresponding struct samsung_cmu_info::clk_regs array to make sure they get initialized. No functional change. This patch adds a feature, but doesn't enable it for any users. Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko --- Changes in v2: - none drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 4 +++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c index 6fb7194df7ab..55490209b9a9 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c @@ -25,6 +25,19 @@ #define GATE_OFF_START 0x2000 #define GATE_OFF_END 0x2fff +/* PLL CON register offsets range */ +#define PLL_CON_START 0x100 +#define PLL_CON_END 0x600 + +/* PLL register bits */ +#define PLL_CON1_MANUAL BIT(1) + +/* Helper macros to check for particular clock regiter by its offset */ +#define IS_GATE_REG(o) ((o) >= GATE_OFF_START && (o) <= GATE_OFF_END) +#define IS_PLL_CONx_REG(o) ((o) >= PLL_CON_START && (o) <= PLL_CON_END) +#define IS_PLL_CON1_REG(o) \ + (IS_PLL_CONx_REG(o) && ((o) & 0xf) == 0x4 && !((o) & 0x10)) + struct exynos_arm64_cmu_data { struct samsung_clk_reg_dump *clk_save; unsigned int nr_clk_save; @@ -40,15 +53,16 @@ struct exynos_arm64_cmu_data { /** * exynos_arm64_init_clocks - Set clocks initial configuration - * @np: CMU device tree node with "reg" property (CMU addr) - * @reg_offs: Register offsets array for clocks to init - * @reg_offs_len: Number of register offsets in reg_offs array + * @np: CMU device tree node with "reg" property (CMU addr) + * @cmu: CMU data * - * Set manual control mode for all gate clocks. + * Set manual control mode for all gate and PLL clocks. */ static void __init exynos_arm64_init_clocks(struct device_node *np, - const unsigned long *reg_offs, size_t reg_offs_len) + const struct samsung_cmu_info *cmu) { + const unsigned long *reg_offs = cmu->clk_regs; + size_t reg_offs_len = cmu->nr_clk_regs; void __iomem *reg_base; size_t i; @@ -60,14 +74,14 @@ static void __init exynos_arm64_init_clocks(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *reg = reg_base + reg_offs[i]; u32 val; - /* Modify only gate clock registers */ - if (reg_offs[i] < GATE_OFF_START || reg_offs[i] > GATE_OFF_END) - continue; - - val = readl(reg); - val |= GATE_MANUAL; - val &= ~GATE_ENABLE_HWACG; - writel(val, reg); + if (cmu->manual_plls && IS_PLL_CON1_REG(reg_offs[i])) { + writel(PLL_CON1_MANUAL, reg); + } else if (IS_GATE_REG(reg_offs[i])) { + val = readl(reg); + val |= GATE_MANUAL; + val &= ~GATE_ENABLE_HWACG; + writel(val, reg); + } } iounmap(reg_base); @@ -177,7 +191,7 @@ void __init exynos_arm64_register_cmu(struct device *dev, pr_err("%s: could not enable bus clock %s; err = %d\n", __func__, cmu->clk_name, err); - exynos_arm64_init_clocks(np, cmu->clk_regs, cmu->nr_clk_regs); + exynos_arm64_init_clocks(np, cmu); samsung_cmu_register_one(np, cmu); } @@ -224,7 +238,7 @@ int __init exynos_arm64_register_cmu_pm(struct platform_device *pdev, __func__, cmu->clk_name, ret); if (set_manual) - exynos_arm64_init_clocks(np, cmu->clk_regs, cmu->nr_clk_regs); + exynos_arm64_init_clocks(np, cmu); reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); if (IS_ERR(reg_base)) diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h index a763309e6f12..a70bd7cce39f 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ struct samsung_clock_reg_cache { * @suspend_regs: list of clock registers to set before suspend * @nr_suspend_regs: count of clock registers in @suspend_regs * @clk_name: name of the parent clock needed for CMU register access + * @manual_plls: Enable manual control for PLL clocks */ struct samsung_cmu_info { const struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clks; @@ -354,6 +355,9 @@ struct samsung_cmu_info { const struct samsung_clk_reg_dump *suspend_regs; unsigned int nr_suspend_regs; const char *clk_name; + + /* ARM64 Exynos CMUs */ + bool manual_plls; }; struct samsung_clk_provider *samsung_clk_init(struct device *dev, -- 2.39.2