Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758151AbXL3XXI (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:23:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754155AbXL3XWz (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:22:55 -0500 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:48001 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753816AbXL3XWz (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:22:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:22:54 +0100 (CET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Jose de la Mancha cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID timeout parameter accessibility request In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 16 On Dec 30 2007 23:42, Jose de la Mancha wrote: >SHORT QUESTION : >In a Debian-controlled RAID array, is there a parameter that handles the >timeout before a non-responding drive is dropped from the array ? Can this >timeout become user-adjustable in a future build ? Not sure about Debian, but perhaps /sys/block/md0/md/safe_mode_delay does something? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/