Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-76073-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:42:44 +0530 (GMT+05:30)
From: Shresth Prasad <shresthprasad7@gmail.com>
To: nstange@suse.de
Cc: jikos@kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz, mpdesouza@suse.com,
	pmladek@suse.com, shresthprasad7@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, zhangwarden@gmail.com
Message-ID: <1da6e25f-3f1e-4acc-8256-53fbbdc29e78@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <878r3eyoku.fsf@>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]     Fix implicit cast warning in test_klp_state.c
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>Is the declaration of klp_get_state() visible at that >point, i.e. is
>there perhaps any warning about missing >declarations above that?
>
>Otherwise C rules would default to assume an 'int' >return type.

I wasn't aware it works like that. You're right I do see some warnings about implicit function declarations of klp_get_state.

Regards,
Shresth