Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-76096-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:25:58 +0000
Message-ID: <170859029406.107193.1029353194533836071.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240221062157.8694-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
References: <20240221062157.8694-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:21:57 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix the kernel-doc notation for the nested union in struct
> scmi_optee_channel to eliminate kerenl-doc warnings:
>
> optee.c:130: warning: Excess struct member 'shmem' description in 'scmi_optee_channel'
> optee.c:131: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'req' not described in 'scmi_optee_channel'
>
>
> [...]

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi/updates), thanks!

[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: optee: fix struct kernel-doc warnings
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/a9c049f47e06
--
Regards,
Sudeep