Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-76718-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <b96f27a5-53fa-495b-b1a4-cff574898083@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:41:23 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/af_iucv: fix virtual vs physical address confusion
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
        Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240215080500.2616848-1-agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
 <47789946-0ffe-462e-9e2e-43b03ea41fe0@linux.ibm.com>
 <20240221143115.6b04b62a@kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240221143115.6b04b62a@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 21.02.24 23:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:36:57 +0100 Alexandra Winter wrote:
>> I would have preferred to do all the translations in __iucv_* functions in iucv.c,
>> but I understand that for __iucv_message_receive() this would mean significant changes. 
> 
> FWIW we're assuming this is going via the s390 tree.
> Please let us know if you prefer networking to pick it up.
> 

Hello Jakub and maintainers,

please take this patch via net-next, as it belongs to the net/iucv module.
Please excuse that it was not flagged with [PATCH net-next]

Kind regards
Alexandra