Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-77706-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1706698706.git.kai.huang@intel.com> <cd88e97e53c502f0a457d6a82a31d9e8e0f9fca7.1706698706.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
 <20240219161611.GBZdN-y6DO-cspaZrf@fat_crate.local> <9164b0e3-f520-4aab-8b80-520131f0e4db@amd.com>
 <20240219203222.GIZdO61ucfq4bFxRT0@fat_crate.local> <283877fd-78c7-4322-bbce-ba6420d56765@amd.com>
 <20240220142812.GBZdS2_HJEA50F8RZD@fat_crate.local> <28a494ca-3173-4072-921c-6c5f5b257e79@amd.com>
 <ec58908ac8bc7d953d4c00825217615918436721.camel@intel.com>
 <24844584-8031-4b58-ba5c-f85ef2f4c718@amd.com> <20240221092856.GAZdXCWGJL7c9KLewv@fat_crate.local>
 <f01b2ad1fe239444148bded21ae4df64e3f267f2.camel@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <f01b2ad1fe239444148bded21ae4df64e3f267f2.camel@intel.com>
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 11:13:44 +0800
Message-ID: <CALu+AoQKmeixJdkO07t7BtttN7v3RM4_aBKi642bQ3fTBbSAVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/coco: Add a new CC attribute to unify cache flush
 during kexec
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, 
	"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>, "luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>, 
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, 
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>, "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>, 
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>, 
	"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>, "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>, 
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, 
	"nik.borisov@suse.com" <nik.borisov@suse.com>, "bhe@redhat.com" <bhe@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 19:50, Huang, Kai <kai.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 10:28 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:30:13PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > I believe the issues were that different Intel systems would hang or reset
> > > and it was bisected to that commit that added the WBINVD. It was a while
> > > ago, but I remember that they were similar to what the 1f5e7eb7868e commit
> > > ended up fixing, which was debugged because sometimes the WBINVD was still
> > > occasionally issued resulting in the following patch
> > >
> > >   9b040453d444 ("x86/smp: Dont access non-existing CPUID leaf")
> > >
> > > It just means that if we go to an unconditional WBINVD, then we need to be
> > > careful.
> >
> > Let's try it.
> >
> > Dave, do you remember what issues
> >
> >   f23d74f6c66c ("x86/mm: Rework wbinvd, hlt operation in stop_this_cpu()")
> >
> > fixed?
> >
> > If so, can you try the below diff ontop of latest tip/master to see if
> > those issues would reappear?
> >
> > Thx.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > index ab49ade31b0d..ec4dcc9f70ca 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -824,8 +824,7 @@ void __noreturn stop_this_cpu(void *dummy)
> >        * Test the CPUID bit directly because the machine might've cleared
> >        * X86_FEATURE_SME due to cmdline options.
> >        */
> > -     if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x8000001f && (cpuid_eax(0x8000001f) & BIT(0)))
> > -             native_wbinvd();
> > +     native_wbinvd();
> >
> >       /*
> >        * This brings a cache line back and dirties it, but
> >
>
> I really appreciate if Dave can help here.
>
> I will also reach out to see whether there's anyone in Intel met this before.

I forgot the details now,  let me recall and try the patches if possible.

Thanks
Dave