Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-78915-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:49:10 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	Tomislav Denis <tomislav.denis@avl.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: pressure: dlhl60d: Initialize empty DLH bytes
Message-ID: <ZdjallR88R5KkATw@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20240223172936.it.875-kees@kernel.org>
 <ZdjaOLVd1yxNXhsp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZdjaOLVd1yxNXhsp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 07:47:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 09:29:39AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > 3 bytes were being read but 4 were being written. Explicitly initialize
> > the unused bytes to 0 and refactor the loop to use direct array
> > indexing, which appears to silence a Clang false positive warning[1].

..

> >  	for_each_set_bit(chn, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > -		indio_dev->masklength) {
> > -		memcpy(tmp_buf + i,
> > +			 indio_dev->masklength) {
> > +		memcpy(&tmp_buf[i++],
> >  			&st->rx_buf[1] + chn * DLH_NUM_DATA_BYTES,
> >  			DLH_NUM_DATA_BYTES);
> > -		i++;
> >  	}
> 
> Not that I'm against the changes, but they (in accordance with the commit
> message) are irrelevant to this fix. I prefer fixes to be more focused on
> the real issues.

Ah, sorry, there are two changes here:
- indentation (which is indeed irrelevant)
- and indexing, which seems the needed one.

Whatever,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko